Deliverance error: no theme matched
rule: <drop theme="//div[@class='entry']/*"/>

Think Progress

April 23, 2009

by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, Benjamin Armbruster, Ali Frick, Ryan Powers, and Pat Garofalo

NATIONAL SECURITY

The Tortured Past

On Tuesday night, the Senate Armed Services Committee released an unclassified version of its November 2008 report, "Inquiry into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody." The report revealed that top Bush administration officials ignored warnings from military advisers before approving torture methods, skipped a thorough legal review process, and failed to fully investigate the origins of the dangerous techniques they prescribed. The report also states that the consequences of their actions trickled down to lower-ranking officers, leading directly to the abuses at Abu Ghraib. Furthermore, according to a detailed timeline declassified by Attorney General Eric Holder at the request of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bush administration officials "reviewed and approved as early as the summer of 2002 the CIA's use of harsh interrogation methods on detainees...including waterboarding." In another startling revelation, according to a senior U.S. intelligence official, "persistent" and "extreme" interrogations were used because Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld demanded that intelligence agencies "find evidence of al Qaida-Iraq collaboration." These various reports have led some in Congress "to push for a full inquiry" into the Bush administration's actions regarding torture. "Our country is turning away from this dark moment. But we cannot afford to leave it behind until we fully understand what went wrong, and do what we can to ensure that America never again loses sight of its most sacred principles," said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI).

OBAMA OPEN TO PROSECUTIONS: As the Washington Post's Dan Balz wrote, "[T]ry as he might, the president is finding it difficult to close the books on Bush's presidency." Indeed, the White House has sent a variety of signals regarding investigations into the Bush administration's authorization of torture. But when asked directly, President Obama said that he would not rule out prosecuting the Bush lawyers who created the legal underpinnings for torture, instead leaving the question up to Holder. "With respect to those who formulated those legal decisions, I would say that is going to be more of a decision for the Attorney General within the parameters of various laws, and I don't want to prejudge that," Obama said. Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has written to Obama asking him to keep the door open to prosecutions, a view that was echoed by former Intelligence Committee chairman Bob Graham. Others, like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), are building momentum for the creation of a "truth commission" to investigate the Bush administration, an idea that Obama has said he would be open to. The Center for American Progress's Ken Gude wrote that "the Obama administration's previous insistence on turning the page on this dark chapter is no longer sustainable. Our only chance to ensure that this does not happen again is to reach a recognized consensus that torture is illegal, immoral, and ineffective and has done great harm to the United States."

TORTURING AN IRAQ-AL QAEDA CONNECTION: As McClatchy reported, "[T]he Bush administration applied relentless pressure on interrogators to use harsh methods on detainees in part to find evidence of cooperation between al Qaida and the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's regime." Such information -- which doesn't exist -- "would've provided a foundation" for Bush's arguments for invading Iraq in 2003. According to the Armed Services Committee report, former U.S. Army psychiatrist Maj. Charles Burney told Army investigators in 2006 that "the more frustrated people got in not being able to establish that link...there was more and more pressure to resort to measures that might produce more immediate results." As The Wonk Room's Matt Duss explained, "[T]he time spent and assets used in attempting to torture out a justification for what we now know was a predetermined Iraq invasion could have been better spent actually protecting America. In other words, the Iraq war was damaging U.S. national security even before it began."

THE RIGHT RUNS TO BLAIR: Of course, conservatives and former members of the Bush administration have rushed to defend the torture methods it authorized. "I think it's all how it's conducted and to what extent things go," former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said. Yesterday, conservatives seized on a statement by Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, who said that harsh interrogations of suspected al-Qaeda officials produced "valuable" information. "Barack Obama's top man in the intelligence community sent the President a memo defending the use of enhanced interrogation techniques," wrote conservative blogger Ed Morrissey. However, Blair also said that it is impossible to tell whether the same intelligence could have been obtained without torture, and in any case, "the bottom line is these techniques have hurt our image around the world." "The damage they have done to our interests far outweighed whatever benefit they gave us and they are not essential to our national security," Blair said. Furthermore, there remains no evidence that torture produced any actionable intelligence. Such intel was reportedly gleaned before "enhanced interrogation" began, using methods approved in the Army Field Manual, the standards Obama has stated will now govern interrogations. In fact, former FBI interrogator Ali Soufan wrote in the New York Times today that "there was no actionable intelligence gained from using enhanced interrogation techniques on Abu Zubaydah that wasn't, or couldn't have been, gained from regular tactics." "I questioned [Zubaydah] from March to June 2002, before the harsh techniques were introduced later in August. Under traditional interrogation methods, he provided us with important actionable intelligence," Soufan wrote.

UNDER THE RADAR

HEALTH CARE -- FDA AUTHORIZES 'PLAN B' FOR 17-YEAR-OLDS WITHOUT A PRESCRIPTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will allow 17-year-olds to obtain the "morning after" birth control pill, also known as "Plan B," without a doctor's prescription. An unnamed FDA official said the government will comply with a judge's order last month that overturned a Bush administration policy restricting access to the drug. U.S. District Judge Edward Korman "ruled in a New York lawsuit that Bush administration appointees let politics, not science, drive their decision to allow over-the-counter access to the pills only for women 18 and older." Korman ordered the FDA to provide unrestricted access to the emergency contraception medication to 17-year-olds and "to evaluate whether all age restrictions should be lifted." "This issue served as a clear example of the agency being taken off track, and it highlighted the problems FDA was facing in many other areas," said Susan Wood, the agency's former top women's health official who resigned in 2005 over delays in issuing a decision. However, conservatives say the FDA should have challenged Korman's decision. "This decision is driven by politics, not what is good for patients or minors," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America. "Parents should be furious at the FDA's complete disregard of parental rights and the safety of minors."

CIVIL RIGHTS -- DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HISPANICS ON THE RISE IN THE SOUTH: A new study from the Southern Poverty Law Center documents the rise of hate crimes and anti-immigrant discrimination against Hispanics in the South. The report "Under Siege: Life for Low-Income Latinos in the South," surveyed 500 low-income Hispanics, both legal residents and undocumented immigrants. It found that regardless of citizenship status, Hispanics are victims of wage theft, worker abuse, sexual abuse, and racial profiling. The report found that 41 percent of Hispanics reported wage theft -- being denied payment for a job they completed. Eva San Martin, "an advocate working in New Orleans," described an incident of wage theft: "The contractor raised his shirt and showed he had a gun -- and that was enough. He didn't have to say any more. The worker left." Another trend Martin observed is "amigo shopping," in which Latinos working as day laborers are attacked and robbed on the street because it is known that they have to carry cash since they cannot open bank accounts. Further, the SPLC found that more than 300 "nativist extremist" groups have been formed since 2005, attributed mostly to the immigration debate, which has "gained currency in large part because talk radio and television news programs trusted by the public have provided a platform...for fueling anger and hate against Latinos." Indeed, the report writes, "Latinos are targeted for harassment by racist extremist groups, some of which are directly descended from the old guardians of white supremacy."

RADICAL RIGHT -- CHENEY PRAISES TEA PARTIES AS 'HEALTHY' AND HOPES THAT THEY'LL HAVE AN 'IMPACT': Earlier this week, Fox News' Sean Hannity asked Vice President Cheney to give his "overall analysis" on where President Obama is "taking the country economically." "Well, I'm very concerned about it," replied Cheney before heaping praise onto the anti-Obama tea parties held last week. "I thought the tea parties were great," he said. He then expressed his view that it would be a "healthy" development if the demonstration of conservative "grassroots" opinion had an "impact" on the debate in Congress. Cheney's praise for the supposedly popular support for tea parties is surprising considering his contempt for public opinion while in office. As vice president, Cheney dismissed the opinion of far more Americans when they disagreed with his administration's continued occupation of Iraq. During one interview, Cheney was asked to respond to the fact that "two-thirds of Americans" felt that the Iraq war was not worth fighting. Cheney responded, "So?" The interviewer asked, "You don't care what the American people think?" "No," Cheney said. Similarly, on Feb. 15, 2003, millions of people across the globe, including up to 375,000 in New York City alone, protested the impending invasion of Iraq. President Bush, whom Cheney has praised for not making policy "based on public opinion polls," dismissed the protesters as "a focus group." According to Fivethirtyeight.com's Nate Silver, roughly 300,000 people across the country participated in the tea parties. Apparently this was enough to convince Cheney that maybe public opinion should "have an impact" on policy.


THINK FAST

Last year, FBI Director Robert Mueller told Vanity Fair that he did not "believe" that there had been a case where "any attacks had been disrupted because of intelligence obtained through the coercive methods." John Miller, a spokesman for Mueller, confirmed that position to the New York Times on Tuesday, saying, "The quote is accurate."

A new AP/Gfk poll shows that, "for the first time in years, more Americans than not say the country is headed in the right direction." Forty-eight percent of Americans say the country is on the right track while 44 percent said the country is headed in the wrong direction. The right track number is up from 40 percent in February, 35 percent in January and just 17 percent in October, 2008.

General Motors (GM) announced yesterday that it will "temporarily close most of its U.S. factories for up to nine weeks this summer because of slumping sales and growing inventories of unsold vehicles." The closings will likely be "staggered between mid-May and the end of July," and may affect "15 of GM's 21 North American car and truck assembly plants, most of them in the USA."

As of 8 A.M. this morning, more than 16,000 of you have taken action to urge Congress to begin impeachment hearings against Jay Bybee. Thanks for your support.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was briefed about the Bush administration's torture program while she served as the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee in 2002. She insists that "the lawmakers were told only that the C.I.A. believed the methods were legal -- not that they were going to be used." Yet, the ranking Republican at the time, Porter Goss, "recalls a clear message that the methods would be used."

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Jon Wellinghoff told reporters yesterday that "no new nuclear or coal plants may ever be needed in the United States." Wellinghoff's position goes beyond other Obama administration officials, "who have strongly endorsed greater efficiency and renewables deployment but also say nuclear and fossil energies will continue playing a major role."

The IMF released a report yesterday finding that the "global economy will most likely contract this year for the first time since World War II." The report projects a 1.3 percent decline in global economic activity and a 2.8 percent contraction in the U.S. in 2009, but expects growth to resume in 2010.

ABC News's George Stephanopoulos was granted an interview this week with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Stephanopoulos writes that the two of them engaged in "some spirited exchanges, as you might imagine, on the nuclear talks, the Holocaust, and who's really to blame for the breakdown in U.S.-Iran relations."

And finally: What would Joseph Wilson do? That's the question that actor Sean Penn has been asking himself in preparation for his role as the ambassador in the upcoming movie about the Valerie Plame leak scandal. Penn has reportedly "spent considerable time at the Wilsons' home in Santa Fe so the actor can study Wilson, his personality, his mannerisms and inflection. ... Penn is so determined to perfectly capture his character that he has even been wearing Wilson's cufflinks."



GOOD NEWS

Lawmakers in Connecticut voted to update marriage laws to conform with the state's landmark court decision allowing same-sex marriage.

BLOG WATCH

THINK PROGRESS: Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) calls the Senate Armed Services Committee report on torture a "Democrat partisan" document.

WONK ROOM: At his slush-fund think tank, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) attacks President Obama's cap-and-trade proposal as a "giant government slush fund."

YGLESIAS: The Washington Post's David Ignatius: We must cover up CIA misdeeds to ensure the viability of future misdeeds.

BALKINIZATION: The torture memos were not issued in "good faith."

STATE WATCH

CALIFORNIA: Gay and lesbian groups, together with progressive and civil rights organizations, are putting together plans for their own ballot measure legalizing same-sex marriage. 

TEXAS: Gov. Rick Perry (R) "hopes to upend legislation that would have the state accept more than a half-billion dollars in stimulus money for unemployment benefits."

CIVIL RIGHTS: "Proposed legislation being circulated on Capitol Hill would give states more time, flexibility and money to meet federal Real ID requirements."

DAILY GRILL

"We have also strongly opposed the overly coercive interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, that these memos deemed legal."
-- Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and John McCain (R-AZ), 4/22/09

VERSUS

"We ought to be able to use something like waterboarding."
-- Lieberman, 4/20/09


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll