Ending The War
On Friday, Feb. 27, 2009, President Obama announced
a firm date for the end of the U.S. military intervention in Iraq. "Let
me say this as plainly as I can:
by August
31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end," he declared. A transitional
force of between 30-50,000 troops
would remain in Iraq temporarily.
"Through this period of transition, we will carry out further
redeployments," he explained, "and under the Status of Forces
Agreement with the Iraqi government, I intend to remove all U.S. troops
from Iraq by the end of 2011." Obama said that the removal of
U.S. forces should make clear that "Iraq’s
future is now its own responsibility.
The long-term success of the
Iraqi nation will depend upon decisions made by Iraq’s
leaders
and the fortitude of the Iraqi people." Soldiers at Camp Lejeune, NC,
where the president made the announcement, voiced
support for the withdrawal. In
Iraq, Pvt. John R. Brown spoke for
many Americans when he told the New York Times, "I
thought the war would go on and on.
... I thought it would never
end."
THE
COSTS OF A MISBEGOTTEN WAR:
The United States began the Iraq war in
2003 under the pretext
of disarming Saddam Hussein of
weapons that he
did not
possess, and out of fear of an
Iraq-al Qaeda relationship that
did not exist. The United States
remained in Iraq as an occupying force,
struggling to rebuild an Iraqi state with no clear strategy, unclear
goals, and little understanding of the violent forces that would be
unleashed and enabled by incompetent American political leadership.
"The number of casualties among Iraqis is disputed but most counts put
the military and
civilian death toll at about 100,000," with
far more wounded and more
than four million displaced
from their homes. Economists
Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz have calculated that
the war
will
ultimately cost the U.S. over $3 trillion.
Since 2003, over 4,200
U.S. troops have been killed and more than 30,000 wounded.
Stressing America's "commitment to uphold our sacred trust with every
man and woman who has served in Iraq," the President promised to "raise
military pay, and continue providing quality child-care, job-training
for spouses, and expanded counseling and outreach to families that have
known the separation and stress of war."
REGIONAL
FOCUS: The U.S.'s
relationship with Iraq will not end with the
withdrawal of troops. Continued diplomatic and development
support will be essential to help facilitate political accommodation
and economic growth. "As
the U.S. troop presence declines,
the need for greater third-party
engagement with Iraq’s internal tensions and conflicts will
increase," wrote Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Brian
Katulis, "particularly along
tense fault lines like the Arab-Kurdish divide in northern Iraq."
Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) has called for a "diplomatic
surge" to "help broker national
reconciliation efforts in Iraq and
ensure that Iraq’s neighbors are properly invested in its
future." Effective regional diplomacy will recognize that many of the
key challenges in the Middle East -- Iraq, Iran, the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- are interlinked. "Every
issue in the Middle East is kind of connected to other issues,"
Lee
Hamilton, president of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars and former chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee,
told Middle
East Progress last month.
"Progress in any area will have positive
spillovers in other areas. If Iraq settles down, that removes a real
irritant in the region. If you made progress in Iran on the nuclear
question it would have a huge impact with regard to Israel, greatly
increasing the security of Israel, and relieving the Israelis of their
major security concern. ... Progress anywhere will enhance the
prospects
for progress elsewhere."
A
PROGRESSIVE NATIONAL SECURITY
FRAMEWORK: Speaking of the
lessons
learned from Iraq, Obama said that "America
must go to war with clearly defined goals,
which is why I've
ordered a review of our policy in Afghanistan. ... We have learned that
in
the 21st century, we must use all elements of American power to achieve
our objectives, which is why I am committed to building our civilian
national security capacity so that the burden is not continually pushed
on to our military." In mid-February, Obama announced the
addition of 17,000
troops to Afghanistan.
Importantly, however, the president also
said that he was "absolutely
convinced that you cannot solve
the problem of Afghanistan, the
Taliban, the spread of extremism in that region solely through military
means. ... We're going to have to use diplomacy. We're going to have to
use development." Utilizing America's full range of powers has been a
central element of the national security policies promoted
by the
Center for American Progress.
|
|
|
|
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged $300 million in humanitarian aid for war-torn Gaza "and about $600 million in budget and development aid to the Palestinian Authority."
THINK
PROGRESS: Defense Secretary
Robert Gates: President Obama is "more analytical" than President Bush.
WONK
ROOM: The New York Times'
coverage of the climate in the 1970s was a
megaphone for science, not "global cooling" alarmism.
YGLESIAS:
The conservative revolution devours its children.
NEWS
HOUNDS: Despite a record of past
disrespectful comments on sexual assault, Bill O'Reilly has been
invited to speak
at fundraising event for rape victims.
ILLINOIS:
Gov. Patrick Quinn (D) said he would give Sen. Roland Burris
(D) "two weeks to quit before urging Illinois lawmakers to consider a
special election."
VIRGINIA:
Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine (D) says the economic recovery package saved
7,100 state jobs.
CALIFORNIA:
Unemployment rate breaches 10 percent.
"I don't think anyone wants anything to fail right now."
-- Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), 3/1/09
VERSUS
"Absolutely we hope his [Obama's] policies fail."
-- Former senator Rick Santorum, 2/29/09
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs summer interns! Click here for more information.







