THINK PROGRESS by Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, Benjamin Armbruster, Ali Frick, and Ryan Powers
The Progress Report
Earlier this month, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki raised the prospect of "setting a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops as part of negotiations over a new security agreement with Washington." "Today, we are looking at the necessity of terminating the foreign presence on Iraqi lands and restoring full sovereignty," Maliki told Arab ambassadors in Abu Dhabi. However, the Bush administration rejected Maliki's demands. A State Department spokesman said that any U.S. withdrawal would be "conditions based." "Timelines tend to be artificial in nature," a Pentagon spokesperson added. But perhaps remembering his previous stance that if the Iraqis "were to say, 'leave,' we'll leave," President Bush agreed last week to a "general time horizon" for withdrawal, adding a caveat that the timeframe being discussed would not be "arbitrary." Maliki contniues to keep up the pressure. When asked this weekend by Der Spiegel when he thinks U.S. troops should leave Iraq, Maliki replied, "as soon as possible." Then Maliki expressed support for Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) plan to exit Iraq: "Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes." Moreover, Maliki specifically rejected the Bush administration's argument against timetables. "The Americans have found it difficult to agree on a concrete timetable for the exit because it seems like an admission of defeat to them," Maliki told Der Spiegel. "But it isn't."
MUST BE A TRANSCRIPTION ERROR: Soon after Maliki said last month that the United States should set a timetable for withdrawal, the administration suggested that Maliki's remarks were the result of a transcription error, a point that multiple press accounts -- as well as Maliki's office -- had debunked. In similar fashion, this weekend, the White House rushed to discredit Maliki's new call for withdrawal. On Sunday, an Iraqi government spokesman called Maliki's remarks "misunderstood and mistranslated" but offered no specifics. In fact, the statement was released by the U.S. military and came only after "officials at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad contacted Maliki's office to express concern and seek clarification on the remarks, according to White House spokesman Scott Stanzel." But the so-called clarification belies the reality: not only did Der Spiegel stand by its version of the conversation with Maliki, but "the interpreter for the interview works for Mr. Maliki's office, not the magazine." Moreover, Der Spiegel provided the New York Times with an audio recording of the Maliki interview. The Times concluded that Maliki "seemed to state a clear affinity" for the 16-month withdrawal plan.
'LET'S SQUEEZE THEM': The Associated Press's Baghdad bureau reported yesterday that Maliki's embrace of a 16-month timetable is part of his "strategy to play U.S. politics for the best deal possible over America's military mission" in Iraq. The AP reported that "the goal is not necessarily to push out the Americans quickly, but instead give Iraqis a major voice in how long U.S. troops stay and what they will do while still there" and to boost Maliki's "nationalist credentials." According to "senior Iraqi officials," Maliki "sensed desperation by the Americans to wrap up a [security] deal quickly before the presidential campaign was in full swing." "Let's squeeze them," Maliki told his advisers. "The squeeze came July 7, when Maliki announced in Abu Dhabi that Iraq wanted the base deal to include some kind of timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops." "This isn't so much Maliki speaking as [it is] Maliki playing to restive Iraqi public opinion," Talking Points Memo editor Josh Marshall observed regarding the AP report. Marshall added that "it is a distinction without a difference. If an Iraqi leader must oppose a continuing US military presence in order to stay in power, then clearly the days of the US military presence in Iraq are numbered."
McCAIN CAMPAIGN 'F*CKED': Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has based much of his presidential campaign on the situation in Iraq. He has said that having the U.S. military stay in Iraq for 100 years "would be fine with me" and that calls for withdrawal amount to "surrender" and are "really inexcusable." McCain actually denied that Maliki had initially called for a withdrawal timeline, like Bush, responded by saying that "we will withdraw with honor, not according to a set timetable." At the same time, a McCain spokesman said recently that the senator "has always been clear that American forces operate in Iraq only with the consent of that country's democratically elected government." McCain made a similar statement himself, saying in 2004, "I think it's obvious that we would have to leave" if the Iraqi government requests a withdrawal. But in a statement, McCain's campaign dismissed Maliki's most recent call for a withdrawal timetable to Der Spiegel, insisting that "withdrawal must be based on conditions on the ground. Maliki has repeatedly affirmed the same view, and did so again today." In fact, a senior McCain official said that "voters care about [the] military, not about Iraqi leaders." In the face of all the contradiction, a "prominent Republican strategist" who occasionally provides advice to the McCain campaign said more candidly, "We're f*cked."
|
|
|
|
On Friday, the Senate plans to begin debating the "Coburn Omnibus," a set of bills "that have broad bipartisan support but have been held up" by Sen. Tom Coburn's (R-OK) objections, including stroke prevention legislation, lateral sclerosis legislation, the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Act, and the Mentally Ill Offender Treatment Act.
CALIFORNIA:
"The number of foreigners landing in Los Angeles Immigration Court has
surged in recent years, while the number of judges has remained about
the same, causing crushing caseloads and lengthy delays."
NEW
YORK: Gov. David Paterson (D)
expected to ask legislature
"to create a low-cost student loan program to make New York more
competitive with other states."
CIVIL
LIBERTIES:
"The deadline for implementing REAL ID has been extended to 2014, and
so the fight between states and the Department of Homeland Security
over a federally approved, state-issued identification card is cooling
off, at least for the moment."
THINK
PROGRESS: Former U.S. attorney
David Iglesias: Karl Rove won't
testify "to keep himself from being indicted."
WONK
ROOM: A "thaw in Arab diplomatic
recognition of Iraq."
THE
ONE BLOG: Center for American
Progress President John Podesta on
his trip to Rwanda: "One of the most powerful experiences I have had."
BURNT
ORANGE REPORT: In a news
article, the Austin American-Statesman
claims House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is "so left-leaning" that "her
parenthetical should be D-Beijing."
"[T]his government does not torture people. You know, we stick to U.S. law and our international obligations.."
-- President Bush, 10/5/07
VERSUS
"The British government should not rely on US assurances that it does not use torture, a report by MPs says. The foreign affairs select committee said the UK and US differ on their definitions of what constitutes torture and it urged the UK to check US claims. "
-- BBC, 7/19/08
Unsubscribe from The Progress Report:
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/newsletters/unpr.html