Porky Promises
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has repeatedly made a major
campaign promise to veto any bill that comes to his desk as
president if it contains earmarks. "I'll veto every
bill that has a pork-barrel project on it," he has said. "I
am a deficit hawk," he proclaimed this week, attempting to explain
how he
would pay for his economic plan that includes massive
corporate tax cuts. McCain has failed to note, however, that
earmarks have paid for projects that he supports, such as U.S. aid
to Israel. Confronted with this reality this week, McCain's
campaign quickly
granted an exception for Israel. McCain "will
ensure America remains committed to the security of Israel, including
maintaining America's assistance levels," a spokesperson said. In detailed
analyses,
Center for American
Progress Senior Fellow Scott Lilly observes that McCain's
ill-conceived earmark-cutting proposal
reflects his greater concern with scoring political points than with a
substantive examination of the federal budget. The issue isn't the
specific earmarks, Lilly argues. Rather, "it's about whether
the debate over the future of this country should be based on fluff
or substance."
FOREIGN AID? JUST PORK: McCain
has long labeled himself as "a very strong
proponent
to the State of Israel." "If
we fail in Israel, where will we succeed?" he asked in July 2007.
It is
surprising then that McCain was unaware that his earmark plan would
obliterate U.S.
funding assistance for Israel. McCain's chief
economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin has said that McCain embraces the
Congressional Research Service's (CRS)
definition
of the term "earmarks." But under that definition, U.S. aid to
Israel is considered an earmark. "[C]ongressional
directives specifying spending amounts that are the same
as shown in the Administration's illustrative listing for
country
distributions also are regarded as earmarks. Annual
earmarks for economic and military aid to Israel totaling $3 billion is
an example
of such directives," CRS explains. CRS also counts "nearly
three-quarters of the entire Foreign Operations Appropriations bill
as an earmark," Lilly writes, including "more than $1.8 billion in
annual funding for Egypt, nearly half a billion dollars for Jordan, and
tens of millions from countries such as Haiti, Kosovo, and the
Philippines. ... All tolled, $14.4 billion, or two thirds of all
foreign assistance, would be eliminated if McCain stuck with this
proposal."
SHUTTING THE DOOR ON MILITARY HOUSING:
U.S. assistance to Israel is not the only casualty in McCain's
anti-earmark
pledge. CRS's earmark
definition also includes funding for
military family housing. The Pentagon has said the proportion of
recruits who remain
in service is 15
percent higher at bases with high-quality housing. As Lilly notes,
Congress has renovated or replaced worn military housing mostly "by
using earmarks." CRS "counts not only the [military] family
housing units added by Congress as earmarks but also those requested by
the Pentagon and the White House." What's more, tens of millions in
military housing are directed to McCain's home state of
Arizona. Will McCain now grant another exception for much-needed
military housing, further eroding his promise to veto "every
bill that has a pork barrel project?" Or will he deride it as "outrageous"
Washington spending?
THE FUZZY MATH: McCain's
earmark numbers simply do
not add up, leaving two-thirds of his tax proposal unfunded. His
estimates of the costs of earmarks are based on CRS's 2005
analysis of the budget, a year in which earmarking reached a high
point. But since then, earmarking has declined 23
percent below 2005 levels, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense
(TCS). While McCain claims $65 billion in earmarks is "already
on the books," CRS's definition adds up to $52 billion. TCS
came up with only $18.3 billion;
the Office of Management and Budget, only $16.9
billion. Ultimately, McCain's budget could not offset the $300
billion a year tax cuts he is also proposing. "Until he has
produced a complete and plausible set of spending reductions to cover
the cost of his tax proposals, he should withdraw them, or at least
concede that they will be paid
for by yet more borrowing and a deeper sea of red ink," Lilly
charged. When confronted this week with the skepticism of experts
about his budget
plan, McCain retorted, "I disagree. I disagree with the experts. I
disagree. I disagree. I
disagree with the experts. I have experts of my own."
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs summer interns! Click here for more information.
Yesterday, the House passed a bill "aimed at ensuring that students get college loans amid credit market turmoil."
MONTANA:
Officials will let some bison migrate through a private ranch bordering
Yellowstone National Park, allowing "a small number of the animals to
avoid slaughter."
NEW
HAMPSHIRE: "New Hampshire Senate yesterday gave teachers nearing
retirement an extra year to qualify for a medical benefit."
NEW
JERSEY: State weighs building first nuclear power plant since 1973.
THINK
PROGRESS: White House spokesman Tony Fratto attempts to rewrite the
President's climate policy.
WONK
ROOM: Coal's front group has a new name: American Coalition for
Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE).
POLITICAL
ANIMAL: The majority of the public in Middle Eastern countries does
not believe that chaos will ensue if the United States withdraws from
Iraq
"quickly."
MEDIA
MATTERS: Right-wing radio host Neal Boortz says teachers' unions
"do
more damage to this country than all the drug pushers together."
"We asked this question to his attorney: Will Karl Rove agree to
testify if Congress issues a subpoena to him as part of an
investigation into the Siegelman case? The answer we got -- 'Sure.'"
-- MSNBC's Dan Abrams, 4/7/08
VERSUS
"Whether, when and about what a former White House official will
testify...is not for me or my client to decide."
-- Rove attorney Robert Luskin, 4/17/08







