The 'Blueprint That Led To Abu Ghraib'
Last Tuesday, the Defense and Justice Departments released a
previously-classified 2003
memo,
which claimed that "federal laws prohibiting assault, maiming and other
crimes did
not apply to military interrogators who questioned al-Qaeda captives
because the president's ultimate authority as commander in chief
overrode such statutes." Written by John
Yoo, who was then the deputy assistant
attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), the memo is "similar
[to],
although much broader" than, the infamous 2002 torture memo, which
was co-written by Yoo and redefined
torture to be only "equivalent in intensity to the pain
accompanying serious physical
injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even
death." In the 2003 memo, Yoo also asserted that "many
American and international laws would not apply to interrogations
overseas" because they "would be unconstitutional as applied in this
context." Like its 2002 predecessor, Yoo's 2003 memo was rescinded
by Jack Goldsmith when he took over the OLC in
December 2003 because of "the
unusual lack of care and sobriety in their legal analysis." Even
though many legal experts, such as former Army judge advocate general
Thomas Romig, find Yoo's argument that "there are no rules in a
time
of war" to be "downright
offensive," Yoo defends his memos as "near boilerplate." Far from
seeing it as "boilerplate," former OLC lawyer Martin Lederman
argues that Yoo's 2003 memo "is the
source of the Nile for the abuse that occurred in Iraq in 2003."
CREATING THE 'CULTURE OF ABUSE': According
to "some legal experts and advocates" who spoke to The New York Times,
Yoo's 2003 memo "adds to evidence that the abuse of prisoners in
military custody may
have involved signals from higher officials and not just
irresponsible
actions by low-level personnel." Noting that OLC opinions are "binding
on the Defense Department," Scott Silliman, the head of the
Center on Law, Ethics and National Security at Duke University and a
former Air Force lawyer," says Yoo's memo "effectively sidelined
military lawyers who strongly opposed harsh interrogation methods."
"The memo helped to build a culture that, in the absence of leadership
from the highest ranks of the Pentagon, allowed the abuses at Abu
Ghraib and elsewhere," Silliman told the Times. Yoo rejects the idea
that his legal opinions have any relation to detainee abuses that
occurred in Iraq. "The 'culture of abuse' theory has no reliable
evidence to support it," Yoo told The New York Times. But Lederman
believes that
Yoo's 2003 memo is "the
blueprint that led to Abu Ghraib and the other abuses within the
armed forces in 2003 and early 2004." His thesis is supported by the
timeline of events surrounding the administration's deliberations
on interrogation policy and the abuses at Abu Ghraib. According
to Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba's report on Abu Ghraib, the "sadistic,
blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" at the prison took place
between October 2003 and December 2003, which was after
Yoo issued his memo but before it was rescinded by Goldsmith.
DRUGGING DETAINEES?: In
October 2006, lawyers for Jose Padilla, who was found
guilty in 2007 of supporting terrorism overseas, claimed in
court papers that U.S.
authorities gave him "drugs against his will,
believed to be some form of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) or
phencyclidine (PCP), to act as a sort of truth serum during his
interrogations." Rather than directly denying Padilla's claim, the
Defense Department simply claimed that it does not torture and "it has
always been our policy to treat all detainees humanely." Now, the
release of Yoo's 2003 memo lends support to allegations that the United
States
may have drugged detainees. In the memo, "Yoo
advised top Bush administration
officials that interrogators
could employ mind-altering drugs if they
did not produce 'an extreme effect' calculated to 'cause a profound
disruption of the senses or personality.'" Jeffrey Kaye, a clinical psychologist who
works with torture victims at Survivors International in San Francisco,
told CQ's Jeff Stein that he believes such drugs "have been used." "I
came across some evidence that they were
using mind-altering drugs, to regress the prisoners, to ascertain
if
they were using deception techniques, to break them down," said
Kaye.
FOURTH AMENDMENT FOOTNOTE: The release of Yoo's 2003 memo on
interrogation also led to the revelation of another wide-ranging Bush
administration legal opinion which claimed the war on terror trumped
constitutional protections. A footnote in the 2003 memo states that the
OLC "concluded
that the Fourth Amendment had no application to domestic military
operations." The footnote is referring to an October 2001 memo
written by Yoo that "focused on the rules governing any deployment of
U.S. forces inside the
country 'in
the event of further large-scale terrorist activities' by
al-Qaeda." In effect, the memo meant that "for
at least 16 months after the Sept. 11 terror attacks in 2001, the
Bush administration believed that the Constitution's protection against
unreasonable searches and seizures on U.S. soil didn't apply to its
efforts to protect against terrorism." The memo was written
"just days before Bush administration officials, including Vice
President Dick Cheney, briefed four House and Senate leaders on the
NSA's secret wiretapping program for the first time." White House
Spokesman Tony Fratto, however, says the wiretapping program, known as
the
Terrorist Surveillance Program, "relied
on a separate set of legal memoranda." The same 2001 memo,
according to a footnote in the 2002 torture memo, "also concluded that
Posse Comitatus -- an
1878 statute barring the
military from participating in "law and order" missions domestically,
under most circumstances -- does not apply to the war on terror."
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs summer interns! Click here for more information.
"After months of warning from senior Pentagon officials that the 15-month combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan are grinding on U.S. troops," the Bush administration will announce next week that the tours of duty will be shortened to 12 months.
MISSOURI:
"Missouri residents heading to the store or going to the polls on
Tuesday may find themselves being asked to sign a petition aimed at
changing the Missouri Constitution to prohibit state-related
affirmative action programs."
ALABAMA: Former
governor Don Siegelman wants Karl Rove to appear before Congress and
testify about Siegelman's prosecution.
ECONOMY: Deterioration
in "states' revenue is likely to continue through the end of this year,
and probably longer."
THINK PROGRESS:
NATO allies rebuff President Bush on expansion, "looking forward now to
the next president."
WONK
ROOM: Oil industry apologists declare, "We like oil," "be
thankful,"
"don't blame oil."
CROOKS
AND LIARS: The Atlantic's Andrew Sullivan: Donald Rumsfeld, David
Addington, and John Yoo should fear being indicted as war criminals if
they leave the United States.
VET VOICE:
Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) violates operations security in Iraq by
revealing "critical information" as defined in Army regulations.
"From June 2007 through February 2008, deaths from ethno-sectarian
violence in Baghdad have fallen approximately 90%. American casualties
have also fallen sharply, down by 70%."
-- Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), 4/7/08
VERSUS
"Iraqi deaths rose from a low of 568 in December and 541 in January to
roughly 721 in February to more than 1,082 in March. ... US troop
deaths have also crept up, from 23 in December -- the lowest number
since 2004 -- to 40 in January, 29 in February, and 38 in March."
-- Boston Globe, 4/7/08







