Worse Than Bush
In 2001, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) opposed the first round of
President Bush's tax cuts, saying they were "generous tax relief to the
wealthiest individuals of our country at
the expense of lower-
and middle-income American taxpayers." But
now, as he runs for president, McCain openly
mocks rhetoric that talks about "who
the, quote, 'wealthy' are in America." In fact, McCain
has offered massive tax cuts, mostly for corporations,
that are as
costly as Bush's tax cuts and even
more regressive. In an
analysis released last week, Center for American Progress Action
Fund Senior Fellow Robert
Gordon and Domestic Policy Adviser James
Kvaal conclude that McCain's proposals are "enormously
expensive,"
as they essentially double the Bush tax cuts.
Additionally, "the McCain plan would predominantly benefit the most
fortunate taxpayers" while shifting "the tax burden from investment
income onto earned income." Not only would McCain ease the tax burden
predominantly for the most wealthy, according to Gordon and Kvaal,
but his plan "will lead to increased sheltering." Additionally, "McCain
cannot pay for his tax cuts without massive reductions in
Social
Security, Medicare, or other key programs that benefit the vast
majority of Americans." In essence, McCain has adopted
the agenda of anti-tax ideologue Grover Norquist, who wants to
make radical changes to the U.S. tax code "at the
expense of lower- and middle-income Americans."
EMBRACED BY NORQUIST:
Throughout McCain's time in the Senate, he has rarely been a favorite
of Norquist's. In fact, just three years ago, Norquist referred to him
as "the
nut-job from Arizona." Pressed on the comment by the Washington
Post, Norquist said he "misspoke" and that he "meant to say gun-grabbing,
tax-increasing Bolshevik." Now, Norquist -- who famously said
he wants the government "down to the size
where we can drown it in the bathtub" -- calls McCain "very
good on taxes" because he has embraced "the Americans for Tax
Reform's entire agenda." Speaking to Newsweek last month, Norquist said
that
"on the tax issue," McCain "has moved very
hard and far, and I believe convincingly." Explaining his recent
embrace
of McCain, Norquist told the Politico earlier this year that "successful
movements accept prodigal sons when they return."
McCAIN BEGINS BACKING AWAY?:
Speaking to the Washington Post last week, Douglas Holtz-Eakin,
McCain's senior policy adviser, responded to Gordon and Kvaal's
criticism, conceding
that they "had a point"
on "the question of tax cuts." "It will
make deficits expand up front, no question," admitted Holtz-Eakin,
former director of the Congressional Budget Office. But Holtz-Eakin
defended the central points of McCain's plan, claiming that
"helping corporations ultimately helps workers because it ensures their
employer remains internationally competitive." "That place has to be
economically viable, otherwise they have a problem," said Hotz-Eakin.
Moreover, though he conceded to Gordon and Kvaal on tax cuts,
Holtz-Eakin's Washington Post op-ed today about McCain's plan for "turning
around the economy" never mentions the massive
corporate tax cuts that McCain billed barely two months ago as the
first item in his "economic
stimulus plan."
QUESTIONS FOR McCAIN: Responding
to Holtz-Eakin on the Center for American Progress Action Fund's
Wonk Room blog, Gordon and Kvaal note that
Holtz-Eakin's "signal that Senator McCain may change his economic
agenda yet
again"
raises four questions: 1) Why is it necessary to cuts taxes for
corporations to make them "economically viable" when the United States
already has the
fourth-lowest corporate tax revenue as a share of the economy in
the industrialized world? 2) Why are deficit-financed corporate
tax cuts likely to increase growth
when (a) in the short-run, Moody's Economy.com ranked them the
least cost-effective stimulus among 13 options, and (b) in the
medium or longer-run, the effect on growth of deficit-financed tax cuts
"tends to be small?"
3) How do massive tax cuts for the most fortunate further shared
prosperity when income
inequality is at its highest level since before the Great
Depression (or earlier)? 4) Given the admission that this plan
will immediately increase federal budget deficits, how will
McCain meet
his own goal of balancing the budget by 2012?
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs summer interns! Click here for more information.
"Bipartisan support is mounting for the Justice Department to investigate the unauthorized searches of all three presidential candidate’s passport files by a State Department employee and three contracted workers in recent months."
OHIO:
"Amid a sluggish economy, a record 1.1 million Ohioans are getting food
stamps."
TEXAS:
State's drought presses farmers and ranchers.
FLORIDA:
"Hundreds of cost-cutting measures will be considered by state
legislators in coming weeks as they carry out the largest one-time
budget cut in years."
THINK
PROGRESS: American Enterprise Institute's Fred Kagan disagrees with
Gen. David Petraeus: "the situation in Iraq today is not fragile."
WONK
ROOM: Resisting fearmongering, Kansas governor holds firm on
rejecting dirty coal.
MATTHEW
YGLESIAS: Liberal hawks use the incompetence dodge to explain their
support for the Iraq war five years ago.
THE
CONSCIENCE OF A LIBERAL: New York Times report on the fight over
financial regulation "lets the Bushies off way too lightly."
"[A]ttacks on American forces are down [in Iraq]. ... The surge is
working."
-- President Bush, 3/19/08
VERSUS
"American forces have just experienced the most violent two-week period
in Iraq since September 2007. ... Between March 10 and March 23, 25
American soldiers were killed in Iraq."
-- VoteVets.org, 3/24/08








