First Casualty Of The Iran War
On Tuesday, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced that CentCom
commander Adm. William Fallon, who had been in the position for roughly
a year, had submitted
his resignation. Fallon's resignation came a week after news
first leaked of an
article in Esquire magazine by former Naval War College
professor Thomas P.M.
Barnett that suggested Fallon was the "one man"
standing between the Bush administration and war with Iran and that it
could cost him his job. "Well-placed observers now say that it will
come
as no surprise if
Fallon is relieved of his command before his time is up next spring,"
wrote Barnett. Though Fallon
publicly rejected the article, he told Gates upon resigning that "the current embarrassing situation,
public
perception of differences between my views and administration
policy, and the distraction this causes from the mission make this
the
right thing to do." White House aides told the Wall Street Journal that
"senior Bush administration officials saw the article as a
sign that
Adm. Fallon was trying to publicly undercut" President Bush. "It
was seen as a form of insubordination," said one
White House aide. While Iran
has been the focus of much of the commentary
surrounding Fallon's exit, Gates called Fallon's resignation "a cumulative kind of thing" that "isn't
the result of any one article or any one issue." In fact, Fallon's
public disagreements with the administration over Iraq may have had as much influence on his
falling out of favor.
A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW: "There
was no question that the admiral's premature departure stemmed
from what were perceived to be policy
differences with the
administration on Iran and Iraq," writes Thom Shanker in the New
York Times. Especially "where his views competed with those of Gen.
David H. Petraeus, the American commander in Iraq, who is a favorite of
the White House." As a nominee for the CentCom position in January
2007, Fallon
refused to endorse Bush's surge strategy, saying that
he's "always been someone who felt more comfortable in smaller
numbers." Since then, he has been a proponent of "developing plans to
redefine the U.S. mission and radically
draw down troops" in Iraq in order to "balance
deployments across the volatile region" he commanded. Last month,
after Gates endorsed
a "pause" in troop withdrawals this summer, Fallon told the New
York Times that it should only be "temporary
and brief" and that U.S. strategy should shift focus to a
"supporting, sustaining, advising, training and mentoring role." A
"senior Pentagon official" told Slate's Fred Kaplan that Fallon's
comments were "unauthorized," which Kaplan says amounts to "challenging the president's
policy...at his own initiative."
'NOT HELPFUL' WHEN IT COMES TO IRAN:
Although Fallon's preference for diplomatic
engagement with Iran rather than saber-rattling has been echoed by Gates
and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael
Mullen, Fallon's manner of delivering that message differed
considerably
from the administration script. In Barnett's Esquire article,
Fallon says a narrow focus on Iran is not wise because "in a part of
the world with 'five or six pots boiling over, our
nation can't afford to be mesmerized by one problem.'" "This
constant drumbeat of conflict" with Iran "is not helpful and not
useful," Fallon told al Jazeera in September 2007. In December 2007, he
told the Financial Times, "Another
war is just not where we want to
go." Last year, he was quoted as saying an attack on Iran "will not
happen on my watch." In November, after meeting with Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak, Fallon allowed it to be reported that he had "ruled out a possible strike
against Iran and said Washington was mulling nonmilitary options
instead." According to Newsweek, Fallon's main mistake was that he
never included the caveat "of course, no options
are off the table" in order to stay within administration policy.
RIGHT WING REJOICES: Right-wing war
hawks are glad to see Fallon go. The Wall Street Journal Editorial
board wrote
yesterday
that Fallon's resignation is "good news" because it will allow Bush to
begin "to pay attention to the internal Pentagon dispute" over Iraq
withdrawal. The New York Sun editorial board concurred,
arguing that the "real news" of Fallon's resignation is that Petraeus
might
get to take over as CentCom commander. Writing an op-ed titled "Fallon
didn't get it" in the Los Angeles Times
yesterday, Council on
Foreign Relations Senior Fellow Max Boot ridiculed Fallon as one
of the "guys who think they're smart" and is "undermining" Bush's Iran
strategy. "Fallon makes it more likely, not less, that there will ultimately be an armed
confrontation with Iran," wrote Boot. Writing for National Review,
conservative hawk Frank Gaffney attacked Fallon as "a
military man who has proven himself utterly unserious about the
Iranian threat" and "had engaged in serial acts of insubordination and
sabotage."
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs summer interns! Click here for more information.
"Americans took 10.3 billion trips on public transportation in 2007, the highest level in 50 years, representing a 2.1% increase over the previous year."
TEXAS:
"Texas insurers were virtually untouched by the slowing economy in
2007," recording "one of their most profitable years of the decade."
ILLINOIS:
Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) has "ordered screening of the state's
waterways for pharmaceuticals."
CALIFORNIA: Dockers
union plans protest of Iraq war on May 1.
THINK PROGRESS:
Pentagon dismisses KBR contaminated water: troops should "just drink
bottled water."
MEDIA
MATTERS: Will MSNBC's Chris Matthews hold his boss, Tim Russert, to
the same standard he claims for others?
GRISTMILL:
New Pew survey shows big support for fuel efficiency and renewables.
"I think when people take a look
back at this moment in our economic history, they'll recognize
tax cuts work."
-- President Bush, 3/12/08
VERSUS
"[M]aking the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and Alternative Minimum Tax relief
permanent would add $4.3 trillion to deficits and debt over just the
next ten years and would substantially worsen the nation's already
serious long-term fiscal problems."
-- Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, 1/28/08







