A Library Worthy Of The Bush Legacy
In Nov. 2006, President Bush launched "an eye-popping, half-billion-dollar
drive" to raise funds for his presidential library. That
campaign finally paid off last week when officials at Southern
Methodist University (SMU) announced
that the Dallas-based university will be home to Bush's $200 million
library -- despite
protests from faculty, administrators, and staff. The library
facility will also contain an institute that will sponsor programs
designed to "promote
the vision of the president" and "celebrate" Bush's presidency.
University of Louisville Professor Benjamin Hufbauer, an art
historian who has studied presidential libraries, said the model
agreed to at SMU was "totally different" from the approaches at other
universities with presidential libraries. The institute that is part of
the complex "has a partisan agenda -- that's very significant," he
said, adding, "academics
everywhere should be concerned about this" because it "goes against
the idea of dispassionate inquiry." Dr. Susanne Johnson, an associate
professor at SMU, explained, "The whole purpose of a library is for
unfettered, unbiased, critically
reflective academic inquiry into the administration of a given
presidency. It's
not to cheer-lead for a particular president. It's not to be
groupies."
BUSH'S THINK TANK: When asked
about his post-presidency plans in January 2006, Bush said, "I'd like to leave behind a legacy -- or a think
tank, a place
for people to talk about freedom and liberty and the [Alexis]
DeTocqueville
model of what DeTocqueville saw in America." (Ironically, the
French philosopher DeTocqueville wrote, "I know of no country in which
there is so little
independence of mind and real
freedom of discussion as in
America.") A Bush insider confessed that the mission of the institute will be to hire conservative
scholars and "give them
money to write papers and books favorable to
the President's policies." Bush's institute has rankled
the university's faculty because it will be independent of SMU's
academic governance. In the run-up to the formal agreement between SMU
and the Bush foundation, critics "suggested making
the institute completely separate
from SMU or bringing it under SMU's control." The final agreement "does
neither," however, because "Bush's representatives had made clear to
SMU" that the library and the institute were "to be a package."
THE MARK OF ROVE: Compounding
fears that the institute will trade academic scholarship
for partisan praise of Bush, Mark Langdale -- president of the Bush
library foundation -- said recently that former Bush political advisor
Karl
Rove is advising the project in "an
informal capacity." Langdale said Rove is "a critical resource about what
happened in the administration, and he has a lot of
good ideas about programming and positioning." Rove has already set out
on a course to whitewash
Bush's legacy, arguing in recent months that it
was Congress -- not the President -- who rushed into the Iraq war.
Many aspects of the "programming and positioning" that the Bush library
will feature
have raised serious concerns. For one, the institute has made an arrangement
with SMU to ensure that the
academic faculty will not serve as a counterbalance against the
partisan mission of the library. Additionally, SMU's sole
representative on the institute's board will be solely chosen by
Bush's
foundation. Dr. Johnson said that
clause "abdicates all power" to the Bush foundation, allowing it to
"cherry-pick representatives from SMU to fit their ideological
purposes" while reducing faculty representation "to something
that's meaningless."
A CENSORED LIBRARY: An executive
order Bush signed in 2001, "which gives presidents and
their families more control over presidential papers, could result in
material being
censored" from the library. The order gives Bush -- as well as former presidents -- "the
right to veto requests to open any presidential records" and to
take "an indefinite amount of time to ponder any requests." One
historian called Bush's order a "disaster
for
history." Referring to the executive order, Rev. William McElvaney
-- professor
emeritus at SMU's theology school -- asked,
"What self-respecting university would accept a
censored library?" "From the very
get-go its purpose is to rationalize and promote programs and policies
of a certain presidency rather than do a strictly analytical, critical
assessment of it," Dr. Johnson said. "It's going to create an ethos
where the students who are more progressive in terms of religion and
politics will
feel even further silenced and invisible than they
already feel." She added, "We all know very well that
this institute -- which has no lines of
accountability to the faculty -- is about getting some scholars lined
up
to put window
dressing on the presidency of George Bush.
|
|
|
|
The House "is expected to approve a measure that would eliminate roughly $18 billion in tax incentives for oil and gas companies, and use the savings to fund tax credits and other incentives for renewable energy."
VIRGINIA:
Gov. Tim Kaine (D) is set to announce "a proposal aimed at
regulating high-risk mortgage lenders and stemming the surge of
foreclosures."
ALASKA:
An Alaskan village sues two dozen oil, power, and coal companies,
"claiming that the large amounts of greenhouse gases they emit
contribute to global warming that threatens the community's existence."
ECONOMY: "Twenty-one
states, including several of the nation's largest, face a
combined budget shortfall of at least $36 billion for 2009."
THINK
PROGRESS: CNN's Glenn Beck: "Rick Santorum is a Winston Churchill."
FAITHFUL AMERICA: Faith
in Public Life is calling on the networks to "start asking both
parties' voters the same questions about faith."
MEDIA
MATTERS: The Washington Times uses a defense "industry executive"
to represent the views of the military.
HOT
POTATO MASH: Former White House adviser Karl Rove
videotaped holding a "free Don Siegelman" banner.
"Many Hispanics, as a matter of fact, you know what culture they are
assimilating to? -- the rap culture, the crime culture, anti-cops, all
the rest of it."
-- Right-wing pundit Pat Buchanan, 8/22/06
VERSUS
"Fears that immigration leads to rising crime rates are unjustified,
says a California study released Monday. 'In California, as in the rest
of the nation, immigrants...have extremely low rates of criminal
activity,' said Kristin Butcher, a co-author of the report."
-- Monterey County Herald (CA), 2/26/08







