The War On Contraception
Every day in the United States, 10,000
young people acquire a sexually-transmitted disease. Teen
pregnancy rates in this country are rising, and 2.5
million people worldwide contracted HIV in 2007. Nevertheless, the
Bush administration continues to push scientifically
unsound policies of abstinence
education and defund widely-accepted family
planning programs. The price of birth control pills on college
campuses, for example, has skyrocketed from as little as $5 a month to more
than $40 because of changes in federal law. Yesterday, however,
congressional leaders blocked President Bush's attempt to expand
abstinence funding at the expense of vital
domestic priorities, freezing
funding at approximately
$115 million in the omnibus
spending bill. They also included over $305 million for Title X
programs, which provide "low-cost,
confidential family planning services." "For the first time in
recent memory, congressional leaders are making
a clear investment in family planning, while finally putting the
brakes on Bush's failed 'abstinence-only' programs," noted NARAL
Pro-Choice President Nancy Keenan.
REJECTING ABSTINENCE:
Abstinence-only education programs remain one of the right wing's
favorite pet projects, placing public health at
the mercy of ideology. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) recently added more
than two dozen earmarks for abstinence education totaling over $1
million to a Labor and Health and Human Services appropriations
measure. In October, Bush appointed
abstinence-only proponent Susan Orr to oversee federal family planning
programs; Orr once called contraceptives part of the "culture of death."
Yet along with Congress, state governments are increasingly rejecting
Bush's abstinence push. At least 14 states have "either notified the
federal government that they will no longer be requesting the funds or
are not expected to apply, forgoing
more than $15 million of the $50 million available." Last month, 10
leading scientists in the field of adolescent sexual and reproductive
health wrote to congressional leaders and "strongly"
urged them to "reconsider federal support for abstinence-only
education programs and policies." These concerns about Bush's
reproductive health policies are well-founded. After the
proliferation of abstinence-only programs nationwide, teen
birth rates rose between 2005 and 2006, reversing a 14-year
decline. A federal
report released in April showed that abstinence-only programs have
had "no impacts on rates of sexual abstinence."
GLOBAL GAG RULE CONTINUES:
Despite these advancements in domestic reproductive rights, the
government-wide spending bill announced yesterday was unable to
increase support for international family planning. Lacking the votes
to override
Bush's veto threat, Congress
was forced yesterday to drop
its insistence that that the 2008 foreign aid budget reverse a
longstanding ban on providing aid -- including donated contraceptives
-- to organizations abroad that use their own money to offer
abortions, counsel about abortion, or advocate to change their
countries' abortion laws. Bush has supported this ban -- first initiated
by President Reagan in 1984 -- since taking office in 2001, despite
the fact that contraception is the most effective way to reduce
rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. A recent study
concluded "abortion
rates are similar in countries where it is legal and those where it
is not." Additionally, "researchers found that abortion was safe in
countries where it was legal, but dangerous in countries where it was
outlawed and performed clandestinely."
A 'DOGMATIC ADHERENCE TO AN ILLOGICAL
POSITION': The Bush
administration's misguided abstinence-only policies have meant a
decrease in contraception funding. When Bush created his President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in 2003, administration
scientists "lobbied
for reinvigorating international family planning efforts," showing
studies that "even a modest expansion of contraceptive programs could
prevent nearly three times the number of child AIDS deaths as could
antiretroviral programs for pregnant women." Yet despite increasing
evidence on the importance of contraceptives, funding has continued to
decline. Funding for birth control programs in Bush's most recent
budget "is
less than one-third the amount spent in 1995, when adjusted for
inflation." Furthermore, a Government
Accountability Office report in 2006 found that countries have had to reduce
spending on HIV/AIDS prevention in order to meet the Bush
administration's abstinence requirements. "This dogmatic
adherence to an illogical position...prevents us from working
effectively to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS and unintended pregnancies
and reduce abortions," said Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY).
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs spring interns! Click here for more information.
Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) won a temporary victory yesterday "after his threats of a filibuster forced Democratic leadership to push back consideration of a measure that would grant immunity to telecom companies that were complicit in warrantless surveillance."
CALIFORNIA:
"The state Assembly on Monday approved the first phase of a
$14.4-billion plan to extend medical insurance to nearly all residents."
RHODE ISLAND:
"Attorney General Patrick Lynch is expected to announce $1.2 million in
grants to combat lead paint poisoning."
ECONOMY:
"For the third time in a month, an analysis of state finances is
warning that budget deficits and spending cuts are on the way."
THINK
PROGRESS: Tony Snow: "The second war in this country" is "the war
on God."
CREW BLOG:
The top ten ethics
scandals of 2007.
MATTHEW
YGLESIAS: Americans don't want a long-term committment in Iraq.
SADLY NO: In
his new book, National Review's Jonah Goldberg claims "the
quintessential liberal fascist" is "a female grade-school teacher with
an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore."
"[W]e have fabulous health care in America. ... [C]ompare it
with
other systems around the world."
-- President Bush, 12/17/07
VERSUS
"The U. S. health system spends a higher portion of its gross domestic
product than any other country but ranks 37 out of 191 countries
according to its performance."
-- World Health Organization, 6/21/00







