The Case For Diplomatic Engagement
A new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) released Monday concluded
that "in fall 2003, Tehran
halted its nuclear
weapons program." The report states that prior to 2003, Iran
was "working under government direction to develop nuclear weapons" and
is reportedly still enriching uranium for civilian uses, but has halted
an active nuclear program. Certainly, Iran is hardly a benign nation,
as it continues to back
Hezbollah in Lebanon, for example, but the NIE states that the
nation is "unlikely to achieve" the capability to produce a
nuclear weapon "until
after 2015." The NIE contrasts with the
intelligence community's 2005 judgment that "Iran currently is
determined to develop nuclear weapons," a "product of a surge
in clandestine intelligence-gathering in Iran as
well as radical changes in the way the intelligence community analyzes
information" after the massive intelligence failures before the Iraq
war. In fact, the 2005 judgment "was also written by some of the
same team that had produced key parts of the flawed
Iraq estimate." The latest NIE "presents a far
more nuanced picture of both the nuclear program
and the Iranian government's intentions than previous estimates,
directly contradicting the one-dimensional portrait painted by arch
conservatives, including many in the White House," concluded Joseph
Cirinicione and Andrew Grotto of the Center for American Progress.
While
the administration has pursued
a diplomatic approach thus far, the NIE makes a the case
for tougher diplomatic
pressure with Iran, as the nuclear program was "halted primarily
in response to international pressure."
RENEWED DIPLOMATIC SURGE: In
the
wake of the new NIE,
the White House has a chance to make a rejuvenated push for
carrots-and-sticks
diplomacy with Iran. After
years of tense diplomatic standoff between the United States and
Iran, Ephraim Halevy of Israel's Institute for Intelligence and
Special Operations recommended
further engagement: "Saudi Arabia and Iran recently held political
talks.
The two countries are sworn enemies, as Saudi Arabia perceives Iran --
rightly so -- as a real threat, yet they found the way to sit and talk,
and so should we." Brookings Institution analyst
Bruce Reidel
urged that
the United States consider Iran in a regional context: the White
House "now
and in 2009 must decide not only how it wishes to
deal with a nuclear threat in Iran but also what it says and does with
Israel about Iran." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)
urged a "top-to-bottom review of his Iran policy and a diplomatic
surge to advance U.S. interests with regard to Iran. Bush should
announce that his Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense are
prepared to meet anytime, anywhere with their Iranian counterparts to
conduct vigorous diplomacy to advance U.S. interests and address the
challenges of Iran."
CONSERVATIVE SLANDER: Conservatives
who
desire a military solution to Iran's nuclear ambitions have gone on a full-scale
assault
to disparage the intelligence community in the wake of the NIE.
Yesterday, former U.N.
ambassador John Bolton called for a congressional investigation into
the "politicized"
intelligence community. Neoconservative "godfather" Norman Podhoretz
wrote a vitriolic conspiracy theory, accusing the intelligence
community of
deliberately "leaking
material calculated to undermine George W. Bush." American
Enterprise Institute's Michael
Ledeen called the NIE "blatant
unprofessionalism."
These Iran war hawks, who have been warning that Iran is close to
acquiring a nuclear weapon for months, seem to be outraged that the new,
more accurate intelligence gathering does not provide fodder for
their warmongering. President
Bush declared yesterday
that Iran remains "dangerous" and that "nothing
has changed."
WHAT DID BUSH KNOW?: The new
NIE was reportedly completed a year
ago but blocked by the White House. When the
NIE was released on Monday, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said Bush was briefed on its
findings "in
the last few months." But despite knowing otherwise, the White
House falsely warned that Iran was trying to "build a
nuclear weapon" that could lead to "World
War III." Bush maintained that he was not
told to avoid this rhetoric, but this contradicts Hadley, who
said Bush "was
basically told: stand down" by the intelligence
community. White House officials are obfuscating on what they knew
and when they knew it
because the answer has the potential to further damage the
credibility of what they have asserted about Iran in the past few
months. Following these
revelations,
VoteVets called for an congressional investigation into the Bush
administration for warning of a false Iran threat despite knowing
the key findings of the NIE.
|
|
|
|
"A new $35 million solar energy research center will team with five New York universities to solve solar-power technology issues."
MASSACHUSETTS:
State panel votes "to press insurers to hold premium increases to 5
percent next year for unsubsidized plans sold across the state."
ENVIRONMENT:
"Across the United States, the number of severe rainfalls and heavy
snows has grown significantly in the last half-century, with the
greatest increases in New England and the Middle Atlantic region."
JUSTICE:
"Black Americans are 10 times more
likely to be imprisoned for illegal drug offenses than whites,
even though both groups use and sell drugs at the same rate."
THINK
PROGRESS: Fox News defends "Muslim hater" Michael Savage, says he
is "very supportive of "Muslims and Islam."
TPM MUCKRAKER:
The State Department gave bonuses to staff overseeing Blackwater.
TV
NEWSER: Starting in March, CNN's Lou Dobbs will bring his
anti-immigrant message to a daily three-hour radio show.
DAILY
KOS: Time magazine protected Joe Klein from congressional pushback
over his faulty FISA reporting.
"The classified version of this National Intelligence Estimate was
briefed to the President last Wednesday, November 28, and has been
delivered to relevant congressional committees this morning."
-- National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, 12/3/07
VERSUS
"I'm told that [Israeli Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert had a private
discussion with Bush about it during Annapolis -- before Annapolis [on Nov.
26]. Bush briefed him about it."
-- The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh, 12/4/07







