Coal's Dirty Little Secrets
Viewers tuning into Wednesday's CNN/YouTube Republican debate probably
saw commercials for "clean coal." They may have also seen an ad for the
debate in that morning's Washington Post, with a note at the bottom
reading: "Sponsored
by Clean Coal, America's Power." These initiatives were funded by
the group "Americans
For Balanced Energy Choices" (ABEC), which receives its financing
from coal companies and "their
allies in the utility and railroad sectors." They are part of a
multi-million dollar campaign aimed at generating public support "for
the beleaguered coal-producing industry at a time when plans for new
coal-fired power plants are being scrapped" nationwide.
The Center for American Progress has released a Progressive
Growth economic strategy based on building a low-carbon energy
infrastructure, based on clean, renewable energy sources, efficiency,
and greenhouse gas emission performance standards for coal that could
"fuel the creation of good jobs and good prospects for workers at all
skill levels."
DIRTY AGENDA: ABEC is a
nonprofit coalition of the top coal companies in America, including Peabody Energy,
the world's largest private-sector coal company. Top
energy executives
recently quadrupled the budget for this coal front group, bringing
ABEC's annual allocation to more
than $30 million. ABEC insists that the coal industry has a "clean"
agenda. But one of its top priorities is to expand coal production
through the promotion of
government-funded "coal to liquid" technology to convert coal
to vehicle fuels. This policy would produce twice
as much global warming pollution as ordinary gasoline production,
while consuming huge amounts of water. Since its establishment in 2000,
ABEC has received support
from the Center for Energy and Economic Development, whose website
-- even in late 2004 -- said that the group rejects the "theory
of catastrophic global climate change." Perhaps not surprisingly,
part of ABEC's agenda is to delay and weaken
any limits on carbon dioxide pollution for as long as possible and
convince Congress to give coal plants free "allowances" to emit
greenhouse gases under any future
"cap and trade" global warming plan.
DIRTY ADS: In order to sell its
agenda to the American public, ABEC has launched a $7-million,
three-month national advertising drive. National Journal notes,
"The first set of ads underscore that coal is the energy
source for about half the nation's electricity output. A second
round will tout so-called clean-coal technologies." Since January, ABEC
executive director Joe Lucas has written
at
least eight "letters to the editor" in newspapers nationwide, pushing
for
more coal plants. ABEC has specifically targeted the 2008 election,
recognizing that it needs an industry-friendly president to advance its
agenda and block global warming reform. In 2000, for example, the coal
industry donated more
than $108,000 to George W. Bush's campaign, compared to just
$16,450
for Al Gore. Similarly, in 2004, Bush raked in more than $250,000 from
the coal industry; Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) received approximately
$6,000. On Nov. 9, ABEC put out a press
release announcing that it was kicking off "its public campaign
urging Iowa caucus-goers to challenge Presidential candidates to invest
in clean coal technology and support coal as part of a sensible and
affordable energy mix."
DIRTY POLITICAL TARGETING: ABEC
also sponsored both the CNN
Democratic debate in Nevada earlier this month, as well as the CNN/YouTube
Republican debate in Florida earlier this week. These
sponsorships were targeted to pressure not only the presidential
candidates and CNN (not a single
question on global warming was asked in either debate), but also
anti-coal politicians in those states. Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid (D-NV), for example, has stood
firmly against the construction of three
proposed major coal-fired power plants in his home
state. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (R) is leading a "crusade
against coal." Crist has unveiled a plan to reduce his state's
carbon dioxide emissions by replacing
coal plants with solar thermal power plants. He has also canceled
plans to build new coal plants that were pushed by his predecessor,
Jeb Bush. "I am not a fan of coal," proclaimed Crist in October,
applauding the news that Tampa Electric shelved plans to build a
$2-billion
power plant. The tide is steadily turning against coal. In the past 18
months, "about a dozen states including Texas, Florida and Oklahoma
also have rejected
plans for 22 new coal-fired power plants." This week, Google also
announced that it plans to invest "hundreds
of millions of dollars" to "develop electricity from renewable
energy sources that will be cheaper than electricity produced from
coal."
DIRTY LIES: The state of Kansas
has been a particular focus in the coal industry's campaign. On Oct.
18, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment denied
air quality permits for two 700-megawatt coal-burning power
generators near Holcomb, KS, "citing health and environmental concerns associated
with carbon dioxide emissions." The decision was "the first
time a coal plant air permit application" had "ever been denied on
the basis of CO2 emissions." Less than a month later, newspapers
across Kansas ran an ad by Kansans
for Affordable Energy
attacking the decision. It featured the smiling faces of Russian
President Vladimir Putin, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, asking "why are these men smiling?" (See
the ad here.)
The
answer, according to the ad, was Gov.
Kathleen Sebelius (D): "Because the recent decision by the Sebelius
Administration means Kansas will import more natural gas from countries
like Russia, Venezuela and Iran." Kansans for Affordable Energy is partially
funded by not only by Peabody, but also Sunflower Electric Power Corp,
the company
whose
permits were rejected by Sebelius's administration. Additionally,
not only does Kansas "currently export natural
gas to other states," but the United States doesn't even "import
natural gas from Russia, Venezuela or Iran."
|
|
|
|
"In an unprecedented show of solidarity, leaders from 150 global companies endorsed the idea of...legally binding" cuts in their greenhouse gas emissions.
TEXAS:
State's director of science curriculum said "she resigned this month
under pressure from officials who felt she gave the appearance of
criticizing the instruction of intelligent design."
MISSOURI:
Gov. Matt Blunt's (R) battle to save Christmas.
POLITICS:
"[V]oters think female governors are better at getting things done and
solving problems than their male counterparts."
THINK PROGRESS:
CNN's irresponsible debate coverage undermines its claim to be the
"Most
Trusted Name in News."
FIREDOGLAKE:
Time's Joe Klein's source for his FISA distortions was Rep. Peter
Hoekstra (R-MI).
HUFF
POLITICS:
How Rep. John Murtha's (D-PA) "surge" comments are being taken out of
context.
MEDIA MATTERS:
CNN's Campbell Brown called MoveOn.org "American insurgents."
"[T]he administration was opposed to voting on it [whether to go to war
in Iraq] in the fall of 2002."
- Karl Rove, 11/21/07
VERSUS
MSNBC'S JOE SCARBOROUGH: We have to start with something that we all
are talking about a couple of days ago where Karl Rove went on Charlie
Rose and he blamed the Democrats for pushing him and the president into
war. Is that how it worked?
CARD: No, that's not the way it worked.
-- Then-White House chief of staff Andrew Card, 11/29/07







