CIVIL RIGHTS
Ending Discrimination One Inch At A Time
The Employment
Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), introduced by Rep.
Barney Frank (D-MA), would make it illegal to fire, refuse to hire, or
fail to promote employees simply based on sexual orientation. While the vast majority -- nearly 90 percent -- of Fortune 500 companies prohibit discrimination on the basis
of sexual orientation, there are surprisingly no federal
prohibitions against such discriminatory behavior. On Wednesday, the
House is expected
to vote on this legislation, ensuring for the first time ever that
gay and lesbian employees are afforded this critical federal
protection. The ENDA legislation originally included all members
of the
LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender)
community, but lawmakers removed gender
identity from the bill because it did not have the requisite
support in the House to pass. "We do not
have the votes to pass the bill with transgender" protections, said
Frank. The relevant choice now facing progressives "is not between
a limited ENDA and a
comprehensive ENDA. It's a choice
between a limited ENDA and no ENDA." Dale Carpenter of the
Independent Gay Forum writes in support of passing a limited bill:
"It's hard to see how [ENDA] serves any principle at all if it can't be
enacted." Indeed, while passing legislation that prohibits
only discrimination based on
sexual orientation may not be the perfect strategy, it will likely
hasten -- and
be a critical predicate for -- legislation that protects the
entire LGBT
community over time. Urge your senators to support ENDA here.
TRANSGENDER EXCLUSION: Rep.
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) is expected to offer
an amendment to include gender
identity protection in the bill on the House floor. Gaining the needed
votes to
pass this amendment will be difficult, but the vote in itself will be an
important step in the congressional education process. ENDA's
omission of gender identity protection has splintered the LGBT
community's support for the bill. Human
Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese issued a message in which
he described the
last two weeks as the "most heartbreaking and gut-wrenching of my
life." But ultimately, he argued, "our community can work
with the people who want to help us, or we can walk out on them."
The question becomes: "Should gays
wait for civil rights until transgendered people can be included?"
Winnie Stachelberg of the Center for American Progress argues the LGBT
community should accept a limited ENDA because it will "build
political momentum for more advances later, including eventual
coverage for gender identity." She notes, for example, that Rhode
Island passed sexual orientation discrimination laws first and
followed them with gender identity protections later when there was
more public knowledge and support.
THE LONG ARC OF PROGRESS: While
the current limited ENDA legislation leaves much to be desired, it
should not obscure the remarkable progress that is in the process of
occurring. "Passage of ENDA is
possible only
because gay people have organized
politically to educate Americans about homosexuality and to elect
sympathetic representatives." Congresswoman Bella Abzug (D-NY)
first introduced a
nondiscrimination bill that included employment protection based on
sexual orientation in 1974. At that time, ENDA was "an exotic cause." Nearly
two decades later, in 1996, it
looked like a version of ENDA that did not include gender protections
was set to pass Congress, but instead, it suffered "a
nail-biter 49-50 defeat" in the Senate. More than a decade later,
"the votes are finally there." Should ENDA finally pass, it would
follow recent successful votes in the House and Senate to add hate crimes protections based on gender,
disability, sexual orientation, and gender identity and expression. The
gains are tremendous, particularly considering that "only a little over
a year ago, the U.S. Congress was casting votes on
whether to write LGBT discrimination
into the Constitution in the form
of a 'marriage protection' amendment."
WHITE HOUSE INVOLVED IN CRAFTING ENDA
BILL: To get widespread support for ENDA, lawmakers compromised
by exempting "small businesses, religious organizations
and the uniformed members of the armed forces" from the bill. Even
still, many in the LGBT community fear Bush will issue a veto of the
legislation. But in a hopeful sign that the White House is prepared to
accept the ENDA legislation, WorldNetDaily -- a publication
that serves as a mouthpiece for the far right -- reports that
a White House official recently told "pro-family leaders attending
a private administration
briefing that White House staffers were involved in the negotiations to craft
expanded religious exemption language for the new ENDA bill." John
Aravosis, a political consultant who blogs on gay rights issues, writes
that news of White House involvement "means that the White House either isn't
sure whether it will veto ENDA...or it means that the White
House isn't sure that they can stop ENDA."

IRAQ -- BUSH'S $46 BILLION
REQUEST SENDS YEARLY SPENDING IN IRAQ TO ALL-TIME HIGH: Yesterday,
President Bush requested
an additional $46 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
If approved, Bush's request would bring the yearly budget for our
wars there to an all-time high of $196 billion.
"Iraq now consumes almost twice
as much funding as is allocated for homeland security, diplomacy,
and international assistance combined,"
according to an analysis by the Center for American Progress.
Bush's war in Iraq continues to balloon not only in yearly cost, but
also in length. Gen. David Petraeus said recently that "historically
counterinsurgency operations [like Iraq]
have gone nine
or 10 years." With that scenario, the Center for American Progress
estimates the total
cost of the war in Iraq to be between $1.1 and $1.5 trillion. Including
Afghanistan, the cost of U.S. wars waged overseas
since Sept. 11, 2001, has already exceeded
$806 billion. That total is more than what the United States spent
in the Vietnam, Korean, or Gulf Wars. Currently, only 26 percent of Americans approve of the way Bush is handling the war in Iraq.
MILITARY -- PETRAEUS MAY RENEGE ON TROOP WITHDRAWAL PLANS NEXT YEAR: In
his congressional testimony in September, Gen. David Petraeus announced
that he would soon begin to withdraw
30,000 troops from Iraq, stating that progress
due to the escalation permitted a reduction to "pre-surge" levels
by next summer. In multiple public interviews after his
testimony, Petraeus vowed to bring the 30,000 troops home by next
summer. "[W]hat I showed on Capitol Hill...will
take place,"
he said on PBS. "Starting in mid-December and then ending in mid-July,
the five Army brigade combat teams and two Marine battalions will
redeploy," he said in an interview with Fox News. But it now
appears Petraeus may backtrack from this central tenet of his
congressional testimony. "Redeployments of U.S. brigades -- even of the
surge forces -- are dependent
on the security situation on the ground in Iraq. If General
Petraeus early next year sees the security situation deteriorating, he
will have the courage to go back to the president and say he needs to
keep forces that he had planned to send home," said Col. John R.
Martin, senior adviser to Petraeus. In the end, President Bush and Gen.
Petraeus's strategy has failed
at its primary goal. Nevertheless, Petraeus wants to buy more time
for his unsuccessful attempt to quell Iraq's civil war.
ENVIRONMENT -- CHERTOFF DODGES
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS TO PUSH FOR BORDER FENCE: Homeland
Security Secretary Michael Chertoff "waived
several environmental laws yesterday to continue building a border fence through a national
conservation area in Arizona." An Oct. 10 ruling by a federal judge
halted construction of the fence, "finding that the government had
failed to carry out the required environmental assessment." Sean
Sullivan of a southeastern Arizona branch of the Sierra
Club,
one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, was frustrated by Chertoff's
decision: "Bulldozing the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area and our
important environmental protections is not necessary to manage the
border," he said. Earlier this month, Chertoff defended construction of
the fence by arguing it was in fact eco-friendly. "Illegal
immigrants really degrade the environment.
I've seen pictures of human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other
human artifact [sic] in pristine areas," he said. "And believe me, that
is the worst thing you can do to the environment."
|

In two new reports, the State Department is "sharply" criticized "for poor coordination, communication, oversight and accountability
involving armed security companies like Blackwater USA," including an
audit that shows "the department cannot say 'specifically what it
received' for most
of the $1.2 billion it" paid to one company.
"Tuition and fees at public and private universities have
risen this year at more than double the rate of inflation, with prices
increasing faster at public institutions, the College Board said in
reports released yesterday." As a result, students
and families are being forced to borrow more, driving up the use of
private loans.
"With hundreds
of thousands of families facing foreclosure in recent months,
lawmakers have introduced legislation aimed at protecting consumers
against predatory mortgages."
The bill, co-sponsored by Reps. Barney Frank (D-MA), Mel Watt (D-NC),
and Brad Miller (D-NC) is "an update from similar legislation filed in
2005."
After being attacked by the right
wing, the Frost family refuses to back down from the fight for children's health insurance. Yesterday, Graeme
Frost's mother, Bonnie Frost, "stood before a microphone at a Baltimore
church, in a peasant shirt and clogs, to make a quiet
appeal for broader health coverage in Maryland."
Senate Judiciary Committee members accused the White House of
allowing the Intelligence Committee to review warrantless surveillance
documents "in return for agreeing that telecommunications companies
should get immunity
from lawsuits." "There is no
excuse for the administration to grant access only to those
inclined to agree with it," the Washington Post writes.
President Bush's "weakened approval ratings" have forced him to take
a "much more personal
role in opposing Congress." Bush "has made 46 veto threats during the first nine and a half months of 2007, compared to 28 such
threats" during his first six years. The Progress Report's Amanda
Terkel also notes, "In
his first six years, Bush vetoed just one bill. In less than one year
under this new Congress, Bush
has been forced to issue three."
New poll finds that in "a 12-month period during which the Taliban
insurgency spread in Afghanistan and violence rose in the country's
major cities, Afghans grew increasingly concerned about security and more people came to regard it as the most
serious issue facing the nation."
Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Washington plan to join California's
lawsuit "suing the EPA for stalling on a decision about whether
to let California and 11 other states force car
makers to produce cleaner vehicles."
And finally: Montgomery Blair Sibley, the lawyer for DC Madam
Deborah Jeane Palfrey,
yesterday told a DC court that his client is a victim of the U.S.
attorney scandal. Sibley's exhibits included a blog post from War and
Piece and an article from Legal Times, none of which even mentioned
Palfrey. Sibley also quoted Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who once said
that the Justice Department was "corrupted by political influence."
Leahy's office later called Sibley "awfully
wacky."
|
|
|

"Yahoo revealed plans on Monday to be 'carbon
neutral' by year's end," offsetting "an estimated 250,000 metric
tons of greenhouse gases spewed as a result of power used by the
California-based firm."

VERMONT:
Forbes ranks Vermont the "greenest" state in the country.
MISSOURI:
Right-wing opponents of stem cell research attempt to "change the
definition of cloning to include the procedure creating the embryo, not
just its implantation."
CALIFORNIA:
Controversial ballot initiative that would "change the state's method
of allocating electoral votes" may be revived.

THINK
PROGRESS: Pentagon co-opted an independent military newspaper for a
PR campaign pushing President Bush's war policies.
MEDIA
MATTERS: CNN's Glenn Beck: "[A] handful of people who hate
America...are losing their homes in a [California] forest fire today."
MORE,
BETTER LIES: In its efforts to re-brand itself, the CIA's new
"Terrorist Buster" logo comically "evokes the Ghostbusters logo."
FEMINISTING:
In an image on Facebook, anti-choice right wingers attack opponents'
looks instead of making substantive political arguments.

"Within some months from now, I would say in seven or eight months, if
we continue to see the progress we've seen in the last eight months, I
think Americans will be generally accepting that we are withdrawing and
ceding more authority over to the Iraqi military and that we are
achieving quote 'success.'"
-- Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), 10/22/07
VERSUS
"We're either going to lose this thing or win this thing within the
next several months."
-- McCain, 11/12/06
|