ENERGY
A Green Opportunity
"Our
addiction to oil has grown into a three-pronged
crisis: threatening our economy, our national security and our
environment," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) at a speech this week at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. Indeed, with
gas prices
averaging over $3.00
per gallon and global carbon emissions exceeding
even the most extreme predictions, America -- as the world's leader
in oil
consumption and pollution -- needs a drastic shift in energy policies. This week, Congress is
beginning debate on sweeping energy legislation that has "kicked
off an epic lobbying war by huge industries" as well as by
environmentalists. "This is going to be the mother of all bills. By
that I mean, any one portion of it is important enough to affect
completion of the whole bill," said a former senator involved in the
energy legislation. It took the 109th Congress four years to produce
the 2005 energy bill, which granted large
loopholes to big polluters, "and even that measure almost died
because of
fights over a peripheral issue involving a fuel additive." In the
upcoming weeks, Congress should resist the intense lobbying and media blitz sponsored by big industry and produce legislation that will reduce
global greenhouse emissions while also securing clean energy for
Americans well into the future.
PAIN IN THE GAS: Corporate
Average Fuel Economy standards (CAFE), which govern fuel economy
standards for automobiles, have not been updated since 1983. With
families being forced to adjust to volatile gas prices by buying less
of other items or by dipping into their savings, the
typical two-car American family will spend over
$3,600 on gas this year if high prices persist. With the current
fuel economy standard at roughly
25 mpg, gasoline demand is "the biggest
share of the 21 million barrels of oil the United States consumes
each day." The Senate took up an energy bill yesterday that would
require automakers to boost
fuel economy to an average of 35 mpg by 2020,
allowing consumers to reduce
the amount of gasoline they need each day, saving approximately
three million barrels of oil per day by 2026. Considered the most
contentious issue in the bill by Reid, big automakers are arming
lobbyists to neuter the new mandates. Detroit
automakers urged
congressional leaders last week to reconsider the energy bill's
CAFE standards, claiming they would "destroy the domestic auto
industry." Industry allies such as Michigan Sens. Carl Levin (D) and
Debbie Stabenow (D) are subsequently offering an amendment to this week
that would "set
lower standards than the bill calls for." The U.S. Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers has launched factually false,
fearmongering-based advertisements in at least ten states, claiming,
for instance, that Congress wants to "take
your pickup away." Ironically, "pickup owners overwhelmingly
support requiring the auto industry to increase fuel efficiency
standards."
THE COAL HOAX: While
greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise,
"a powerful
roster of Democrats and Republicans is pushing to subsidize
coal as the king of alternative fuels." Pushed by heavy
lobbying from the coal industry, which is running ad campaigns
urging people to "imagine a world where our country runs on energy from
Middle America instead
of the Middle East," lawmakers from coal producing states are
proposing legislation to subsidize coal-to-liquids fuel. But
coal-to-liquid fuels "produce almost twice
the volume of greenhouse gases as ordinary diesel" and "create
almost a ton of carbon dioxide for every barrel of liquid fuel." A
stronger proposal is carbon
capture and storage, as proposed by the Center for American
Progress, which would literally "capture" carbon emissions from coal
plants before they are dangerously emitted into the atmosphere and use
the energy in coal to generate electricity instead of producing liquid
fuel. Electrifying cars would also allow renewable energy like solar
and wind to further mitigate carbon emissions. This alternative
safeguards the environment, as burning liquid coal in automobiles produces
more carbon pollution than gasoline.
PIPE CLEANING: In the wake of
the Supreme Court's landmark ruling that "the federal
government does have the authority to regulate greenhouse gases,"
the ability to regulate air pollution has created a dichotomy between
states and the federal government. For example, California has asked
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "more
than 40 times over the past 30 years" to "waive the agency's
emissions rules to allow the state's more stringent regulations to take
effect." If California receives the authority to establish its own
tailpipe emissions standards, several
other states have signaled they will adopt the California program.
But a "regressive
bill" drafted by Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) and Rick Boucher (D-VA)
would override the Court's decision and block states from
reducing "greenhouse gases from vehicles at a time when the states are
far ahead of the federal government in dealing with climate change."
Eight governors have voiced strong
opposition to such a proposal. The White House is colluding,
potentially illegally, to help big
industry battle this progressive standard. Yesterday, House
Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote to
Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Mary Peters requesting
information about a voicemail left by
a DOT employee that urged members of Congress to oppose
California's request. "Such an effort by the Department appears to be
highly inappropriate and would
be considered by some to be illegal," Waxman wrote. In the
past week, lobbyists from big
chemical and electric companies have twice met with White House allies concerning the EPA, including Vice
President Dick Cheney. As the Washington Post said, "What California is
seeking permission to do wouldn't
be necessary if the federal government had been serious about air
pollution (initially) and global warming (now)."

ETHICS -- NEW JUSTICE DEPT. E-MAILS
REVEAL TOP ROVE AIDES' INVOLVEMENT IN ATTORNEY SCANDAL: A new
set of documents released last night in the ongoing U.S. attorney scandal shines new
light on how closely the White House and the Department of Justice
coordinated in their efforts to respond to the uproar over the firing
of nine U.S. attorneys last year. "Then-White House counsel Harriet
E. Miers and aides to presidential adviser Karl Rove were deeply
enmeshed in debates over how to respond to the controversy as early
as mid-January, when Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) questioned the spate
of prosecutor departures in a Senate floor speech, according to e-mails
that the Justice Department turned over to the House and Senate
judiciary committees." The emails, from February 2007, all relate to
the case of Rove-protege Tim Griffin, who was installed as U.S. attorney in Arkansas without Senate confirmation. Griffin's
predecessor, Bud Cummins, was fired to make way for Griffin. In one e-mail, former White House political
director Sara Taylor, who resigned
last month, writes to Kyle Sampson, Alberto Gonzales' former chief
of staff, and suggests
retribution against Cummins for speaking out about the reason for his
firing. "I normally don't like attacking our friends, but since Bud
Cummins is talking to everyone," wrote Taylor. "Why don't we tell the
deal on him?" In another e-mail, Taylor wrote to Sampson complaining
about Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty's public acknowledgment that
Cummins had been pushed out to make room for Griffin rather than for
performance reasons. "Tim was put in a horrible position; hung out to
dry w/ no heads up," lamented Taylor. "This
is not good for his long-term career." Griffin has since resigned his position. In a statement, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the chairman
of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that "these documents, which
should have been released by the Department long ago, provide further
evidence that White House officials like former Political Director Sara
Taylor were deeply
involved in the mass firings of well-performing prosecutors."
CONGRESS -- REP. HUNTER DEFENDS FAILED PET PROJECT: Yesterday,
members of the House Committee on Science and Technology watched
videos "of what they got for $63 million spent on an experimental
aircraft the military did not want: repeated crashes and significant
failures." According to testimony from the Office of Naval Research,
the DP-2, a plane "designed to take off like a helicopter and then fly
at high speed, failed to remain in the air for more than a few seconds
in 49 separate tests last year." Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), who had "aggressively
supported the program over decades even though the Pentagon
repeatedly questioned the jet's feasibility and lambasted the
contractor's work," defended his role in leading the effort to
secure funding "on behalf of a hometown company, DuPont
Aerospace." "The idea around here that if the Pentagon doesn't come up
with something, that if the services don't like it, you're not going to
build it is ridiculous," said Hunter, who received $36,000 in campaign
contributions from DuPoint Aerospace. But experts who testified before
the committee claimed that "the aircraft was nowhere near delivering on
the promises cited by DuPont and its congressional supporters. 'It's
a pipe dream,' said John Eney, an aerospace engineer who led a Navy
team that evaluated the project in 1999." As the San Diego Union
Tribune notes, "Hunter's support of the DP-2 has thrust him into the
center of the debate about earmarks, which congressmen sponsor to fund
everything from new roads and museums in their districts to defense
contracts that sometimes provide hundreds of jobs for constituents."
CIVIL LIBERTIES -- FBI'S TERROR WATCH LIST 'OUT OF CONTROL': The Blotter reports today that "a terrorist watch list compiled by the
FBI has apparently swelled to include more than half a
million names."
The tally, which an FBI spokesman insisted is classified, was revealed
in a "portion of the FBI's unclassified 2008 budget request posted to
the Department of Justice Web site" which referenced the "entire watch
list of 509,000 names." According to the Blotter, the FBI's list along
with a list compiled by the National Counterterrorism Center forms the
basis for "the watch list used by federal security screening personnel
on the lookout for terrorists." Such a vast list the ACLU argues,
however, is "virtually useless"
and is growing "seemingly without control or limitation." "If we have
509,000 names on that list... [y]ou'll be capturing innocent
individuals with no connection to crime or terror," said ACLU senior
legislative counsel Tim Sparapani. The Blotter notes, "U.S. lawmakers
and their spouses have been detained because their names were on the
watch list" and "[r]eporters who have reviewed versions of the list
found it included the names of former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, at
the time he was alive but in custody in Iraq ... and 14 of the 19 Sept.
11, 2001 hijackers, all of whom perished in the attacks." Despite such
deficiencies, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
recently urged the IRS to use the FBI's list over Treasury Department's
own smaller,
more targeted watch list to screen "nonprofit tax filings for possible matches to
suspected terrorists." Sparapani notes, "There's a reason the FBI has a
'10 Most Wanted' list, right? We need to focus the government's efforts on the
greatest threats."
|

"Suspected al-Qaida insurgents on Wednesday destroyed the two
minarets of the Askariya Shiite shrine in Samarra, authorities
reported, in a repeat of a 2006 bombing that shattered its famous
Golden Dome and unleashed
a wave of retaliatory sectarian violence that still bloodies Iraq."
A senior U.S. military commander said yesterday that Iraq's army
"must expand its rolls by at least 20,000 more soldiers than Washington
had anticipated," and that even then, "Iraq will remain
incapable of taking full responsibility for its security for
many years -- five years in the case of protecting its airspace -- and
will require
a long-term military relationship with the United States."
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) yesterday "defended
his role in helping steer tens of millions of dollars" to a San
Diego-based aerospace firm to "develop a military jet the
Pentagon did not want."
Hunter "aggressively supported the program over decades" while
receiving large contributions from the firm "even though the Pentagon
repeatedly questioned the jet's feasibility and lambasted the
contractor's work."
"As motorists face near-record gasoline prices, the Senate
took up an energy bill Tuesday that would raise vehicle
fuel-economy standards for
the first time in nearly 20 years and make oil-industry price
gouging a federal crime."
The Pentagon-run system voting system for American
soldiers and citizens living abroad "remains
slow, confusing and plagued with security and privacy problems. And
that has left many of the five million Americans overseas uncertain
that their vote will be counted."
Undocumented immigrants who are taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement often do not receive proper
medical care, "leading
to disfigurement and even death."
"The U.S. military is probing
how guards failed to prevent the death of a Guantanamo Bay
detainee last month, an apparent suicide in one of the most closely monitored
detention camps for suspected al-Qaida and Taliban members."
"The Bush administration proposes cutting 1.5 million acres
from Northwest forests considered critical to the survival of the northern spotted owl," a
continuation of Bush efforts that were "stymied by court rulings,
including several
that tossed out plans to log in critical owl habitat."
And finally: Yesterday was a "big day" for Rep. Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL), whose appropriations bill was being marked up
by the full committee. To "lighten the mood," ranking member Zach Wamp
(R-TN) "delivered a whole load of Little Debbie snack cakes to the room as she took the gavel." Wamp said they were in
honor of "Big Debbie." "Victory on passage of the Legislative
Branch Appropriations bill was
made even sweeter when the loyal opposition served up dessert," said
Wasserman-Schultz after the hearing.
|
|
|

Human rights organization Amnesty International has adopted
a broader sexual and reproductive health policy that calls on
states to ensure that women have access to safe abortion care under
certain circumstances.

MASSACHUSETTS:
Lawmakers meet tomorrow to decide the fate of a proposed constitutional
amendment banning gay marriage.
CONNECTICUT:
State ethics chief faces his own ethics complaints.
DISTRICT
OF COLUMBIA: Ranks fourth-worst in the nation in
preparing public school students for college.

THINK
PROGRESS: Fox News' Bill O'Reilly defends his lack of Iraq
coverage: explosions in Iraq "don't mean anything."
BLOG
FOR CLEAN AIR: Major polluters lobby White House in meetings.
DEEP
SEA NEWS: "The Army now admits that it secretly dumped 64 million
pounds of nerve and mustard agents into the sea," along with hundreds
of thousands of chemical-filled munitions and tons of radioactive waste.
NEWS
HOUNDS: For Father's Day, Fox News blames liberals and feminists
for almost all of America's social ills.

"Social conservatives bite bullet, back Rudy."
-- Politico headline, 5/28/07,
explaining conservatives' support of former New York City mayor Rudolph
Giuliani
VERSUS
"Conservatives would bolt over Rudy."
-- Politico headline, 6/11/07,
explaining conservatives' aversion to Giuliani
|