| |
 |
| |
|
GOOD NEWS
Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer (D) said "no,
nope, no way, hell no" Tuesday to helping create the first national identification cards,
signing into law a bill that blocks
the state from complying with the REAL ID Act.
STATE WATCH
MISSISSIPPI:
A bold developer is embarking on a massive building project to provide
homes for thousands of Katrina refugees.
UTAH:
Health insurance premium costs skyrocketed 5.6 percent between
2000 and 2005, while the number of residents without coverage rose
ECONOMY:
Several states are being strained by poor collection of sales tax
revenues.
BLOG WATCH
THINK
PROGRESS: President Bush brings Iraq "death and destruction" tour
to local high schools.
DAILY
KOS: Attention conservatives blaming the Virginia Tech victims:
"They DID fight back."
NO COMMENT:
British Prime Minister Tony Blair to succeed World Bank President Paul
Wolfowitz?
GULF
COAST RECONSTRUCTION WATCH: "New Orleans' economy improves, but
infrastructure remains a disaster."
DAILY GRILL
"Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., submitted the names of two candidates to
replace Heffelfinger. His staff said Paulose was not one of them."
-- Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 4/14/07,
on Coleman's denial that he ever nominated Rachel Paulose to succeed
Thomas Heffelfinger as U.S. attorney in Minnesota
VERSUS
"Paulose, who Coleman recommended for the post earlier this year, will
succeed Thomas Heffelfinger, who resigned from the position in
February."
-- Press release from Coleman's office, 12/9/06
ARCHIVES
Progress Report
STUDENTS
Politics with an Attitude: Everyone from Barack Obama to Stephen Colbert talks to Campus Progress. Right-wingers seem scared of us. Find out why here. |
|
|
|
by Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Amanda Terkel,
Satyam Khanna, and Matt Corley
WOMEN'S RIGHTS New Court Begins Chipping Away
In a 5-4
decision yesterday, the Supreme Court dealt a damaging blow to
women's rights, upholding a 2003 law that banned some mid-term
abortions as early as 12 to15 weeks, without providing an
exception for the health of the pregnant mother. The Court's decision,
which marked the "first
time the justices agreed that a specific abortion procedure could
be banned," blatantly defied its own recent ruling
in 2000, which said a mid-term abortion ban without exceptions
for the health of the woman was an unconstitutional restriction. The
ruling "clears the way for states to pass
new laws" designed to discourage women from having abortions. "For
the first
time in 30 years, the Supreme Court has sanctioned a law that does
not protect women's health and prohibits doctors from exercising their
best medical judgment," said
Jessica Arons, the director of
women's health and rights program at the Center for American Progress.
The
majority opinion, authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy and joined
by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia,
Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, dismissed the medical
community's opinion and instead adopted
political rhetoric intended to appeal to the right-wing base.
Noting the deep hostility to women's rights contained in the majority
opinion's language, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing in dissent,
said, "Throughout, the opinion
refers to obstetrician-gynecologists and surgeons who perform abortions
not by the titles of their medical specialties, but
by the pejorative label abortion doctor. A fetus is described as an
'unborn child,' and as a 'baby,'...and the reasoned medical
judgments of highly trained doctors are dismissed as 'preferences'
motivated by 'mere convenience.'" Reading her dissent aloud in
a stone-silent courtroom, Ginsburg said the decision "cannot
be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away" at a
woman's right to choose to have an abortion.
NO MORE HEALTH EXCEPTION: In 2003, Congress passed, and Bush
signed, the "Partial
Birth Abortion Ban Act." In
its passage, Congress refused to adopt an amendment proposed by Sen.
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) that would have banned such abortions except in
cases where "the
medical judgment of the attending physician" determined the abortion was necessary
to preserve the life of the woman or avert serious adverse health
consequences. Rather than crafting appropriate law, conservatives
appeared more interested in setting up a judicial showdown over ways to
restrict the right to abortion itself. The Court's decision now
imperils the requirement for a woman's "health exception," which until
yesterday, had survived long legal
scrutiny. The American College Obstetricians and
Gynecologists had informed the Court that upholding the Ban would
"chill doctors from providing a wide range of procedures used to
perform induced abortions or to treat cases of miscarriage and will gravely
endanger the health of women in this country." Yesterday, the
women's health physicians group said, "This decision discounts
and disregards the medical consensus [and] diminishes the
doctor-patient relationship by preventing physicians from using their
clinical experience and judgment."
FORCING WOMEN TO SUFFER: "The
[Partial Birth Abortion Ban] act, on
its face, is not void for vagueness and does not impose an undue
burden from any overbreadth," Kennedy wrote for the court. He added
that the proper way to make a challenge, if an abortion ban is claimed
to harm a woman's right to abortion, is through
an as-applied claim. "In
effect, the decision deputizes
district judges across the country to authorize or deny
partial-birth abortions to pregnant women based on health
considerations." Practically speaking, Kennedy's argument means
the Court will consider the burdens of the mid-term abortion ban only
if a woman is forced into a health-threatening situation, and the
judiciary branch will examine such hardships on a case-by-case basis --
a rule never imposed before because of the time limitations involved in
terminating a pregnancy. Eve Gartner of Planned Parenthood
Federation of America said in response, "The idea that women could
bring 'as applied' challenges literally as they're in the hospital
bleeding or suffering some serious medical harm and need a banned
abortion, the Court suggests well at that point the woman could bring a
federal lawsuit. But just saying that shows how
absurd and unworkable that remedy is."
ELECTIONS MATTER: The most
important vote yesterday was that of the newest justice,
Samuel Alito, appointed by President Bush after he won reelection to a second term in office. As a member of the 3rd District Court of
Appeals, Alito had voted in July 2000 to strike
down New Jersey's ban on mid-term abortions. "The New Jersey
statute," he wrote, "lacks an exception for the preservation of the
health of the mother." When Alito was nominated by Bush to
replace O'Connor, many of his supporters argued that his decision
in this case "proved that he would not be reliably
anti-choice." He earned support in his nomination process when he
said he "would
not bring a political agenda to the court" and would be "respectful
of precedent." But once presented with the opportunity to
impose new ideological law, Alito grasped it, parting ways with
O'Connor and his own previous judgments. The Washington Post's Andrew
Cohen writes, "You can spin this any other way you want but in the end
it comes down to a simple matter of personnel. Justice Alito was willing
and able to go in the law where his predecessor, former Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor wasn't."
|
Under the Radar
ETHICS
-- FBI RAIDS ABRAMOFF-LINKED CONGRESSMAN'S HOME: FBI agents searched
the home of Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) yesterday, who is "under
scrutiny over his ties to convicted GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff."
Doolittle's ties to the disgraced lobbyist are quite extensive,
as he "received $64,500 from Abramoff, his partners, and clients between 2001 and 2004.
Abramoff let Doolittle hold fundraisers
in his sky box for free, and paid to send Doolittle's top aide to Puerto Rico.
He hired Doolittle's then-chief of staff, Kevin Ring, who in turn
helped hire Doolittle's wife. Julie Doolittle, who owned a consulting
firm, was brought on by Abramoff and his firm, Greenberg Traurig, to do fundraising
for Abramoff's charity." Despite these other clear connections,
Dolittle maintains that Abramoff's ties to Doolittle's wife's
business are the only reason for the FBI's raid. "My wife has
been cooperating with the FBI and the Justice Department for almost
three years and that cooperation is going to continue in the future. I
support my wife 100 percent and fully expect that the truth will
prevail," he said in a statement yesterday. As Roll Call notes,
Doolittle is seemingly quite embarrassed about the allegations, as he
has not "made any attempt to personally inform House Minority Leader
John Boehner (R-OH) of the event. Doolittle
has been on the Hill all week and voted on the floor Wednesday."
ADMINISTRATION -- POLITICIZATION
CONTINUES IN NON-POLITICAL RANKS OF DOJ: A "Group of Concerned
Justice Department Employees" have sent an anonymous
letter to both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees revealing
that "the non-political ranks of Justice employees...are consistently
and methodically being eroded by partisan politics." As Politico
explained, "Under normal circumstances, the various divisions at
Justice review applications from potential hires, set interviews and
send the list to the Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management,
which gives the green light to proceed." The letter detailed, however,
that the recruitment office is "no longer the final step...because the
list had to go higher" -- to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General
Paul McNulty. The letter continues that "when the list of potential
interviewees was returned, it had been cut
dramatically...many sections were left with fewer potential
interviews than vacant slots to fill." In a Dec. 5, 2006, meeting
scheduled in response to the complaints, McNulty's chief of staff was "offensive to
the point of [being] insulting" and claimed that his "screening
panel" had struck people from the list because of "grades, spelling
errors on applications, and inappropriate information about them on the
Internet." Justice Department staff, however, found that among those
individuals rejected by McNulty's office, "one common denominator
appeared repeatedly" -- they had "interned for a
Hill Democrat, clerked for a Democratic judge, worked for a 'liberal'
cause, or otherwise appeared to have 'liberal' leanings." The
letter concluded that "while the current political appointees
repeatedly remind everyone that the U.S. Attorneys 'serve at the
pleasure of the President,' the Department's career attorneys serve the
people of the United States" and urged Congress to "include this
politicizing of the career ranks in your questioning of Attorney
Gonzales and his staff." The Justice Department has refused
to comment on the letter.
ENVIRONMENT -- NEW POLL SHOWS
AMERICANS WANT ACTION NOW ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE: The
majority of Americans "feel new urgency" for "immediate
action to tackle global warming and achieve energy independence,"
according to a new poll for the Center for American Progress conducted
by GreenbergQuinlanRosner Research. On the heels of Al Gore's
Oscar-winning film "An
Inconvenient Truth" and a
series of reports by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, over three-quarters of Americans now believe that global
warming is real and apparent. Sixty percent of those surveyed not only
believe that "the increasing pollution of the past few decades has set
global warming into motion," but also that "we
must take action now or it will be too late to stop it." This sense
of urgency crosses party lines, as "huge majorities of Independents (59
percent) and Democrats (76 percent) support action now along with a
significant bloc of Republicans (41 percent)." The poll also
found that the vast majority of Americans are ready and willing to move
from oil and coal as fuel sources to alternative fuels. Even when
presented with the point of view of critics, the survey shows "strong
public support for a series of proposals to move to clean, alternative
energy, institute higher mileage standards for automobiles, and cap
carbon emissions from industry to tackle our dependence on oil and stop
global warming." "This new poll demonstrates that legislators can
support clean alternative energy and limits on global warming pollution
with the confidence that the American people will enthusiastically
applaud such efforts," write Center for American Progress President
John Podesta, Senior Fellow and Director of Climate Change Strategy
Daniel J. Weiss, and Senior Vice President for Communications Laura
Nichols. "Conversely, the public will disapprove of inaction or efforts
that expand our reliance on conventional fuels or more global warming
pollution."
|
|
Think Fast
78: Percentage of Americans who believe undocumented
immigrants now in the United States should
be given a chance at citizenship, according to a USA Today/Gallup
poll, showing "the American public appears to have reached a consensus
on the question."
Senate conservatives "blocked
legislation yesterday that would have allowed the federal
government to negotiate Medicare drug prices." Eighty-five
percent of Americans support such negotiations.
"For six years, the Bush administration, aided by Justice Department
political appointees, has pursued an aggressive legal effort to restrict
voter turnout in key battleground states in ways that favor Republican political candidates. ... On virtually
every significant decision affecting election balloting since 2001, the
division's Voting Rights Section has come
down on the side of Republicans."
"Congressional Democratic leaders are moving to make their proposed timetable
for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq 'advisory' as they seek
to reconcile
two versions of war spending legislation into a single bill that
they plan to pass next week, according to several House members."
Terrorism strikes the poor in Iraq: "While Baghdad
remains in shock over the massive bombings that
targeted...the poorer areas of the city, and caused hundreds of
casualties in crowded marketplaces and neighborhoods, Iraqi politicians
who inhabit
the safe, guarded quarters of the capital are busy in their
attempts to fortify their positions in the political system."
A senator has placed an "anonymous hold"
on "legislation
moving through the Senate that would require lawmakers' campaign
finance reports to be electronically filed, meaning quickly
made public."
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee today in a "make-or-break
appearance" about the Bush administration's prosecutor purge. Four
legal experts, including ousted U.S. attorney David Iglesias, pose
questions they would ask Gonzales.
"Children in Sudan are press-ganged, coerced to
join armed groups, raped and used
as forced labor or sex slaves, according to a new report by
humanitarian groups."
And finally: Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) can't get
any of female congresswomen to join her morning walks on the National
Mall. "They're all guys," she said of her companions. She likes to walk
because, "I eat chocolate and I eat chocolate and I eat more chocolate.
And I love
it," but quickly added, "Diet
is part of it, too."
|
|