| |
 |
| |
|
GOOD NEWS
Global Green USA has lined up 30 "environment-friendly rides" for
"celebrities wanting to make a green
statement on the way to the red carpet of the Oscars."
STATE WATCH
IDAHO:
Conservative state lawmakers kill an effort to index
Idaho's minimum wage to inflation.
ILLINOIS:
State Rep. Greg Harris (D) introduced a bill yesterday to legalize
same-sex marriage.
NORTH
CAROLINA: State eyeing "green guidelines" to lead the battle
against global warming.
WYOMING:
Bill defeated in State House that would have banned Wyoming from
recognizing gay marriages
from other states.
BLOG WATCH
THINK
PROGRESS: Pentagon's Iraq report contradicts White House's rosy
rhetoric on U.K. troop withdrawals.
TAPPED:
New York Times Book Review editor explains why there are so few female
review: women are unable to write for a "general audience" on issues
such as military affairs.
THE GAVEL: Military
officials speak out on the strain of escalation on U.S. troops.
FEDSPENDING.ORG: New and
improved searchable database of nearly all government spending since FY
2000.
DAILY GRILL
"I do not consider Building 18 to be substandard. ... We needed to do a
better job on some of those rooms, and those of you that got in today
saw that we frankly have fixed all of those problems. They weren't
serious, and there weren't a lot of them."
-- Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, 2/22/07,
at a press conference at Walter Reed's Building 18
VERSUS
"Kiley might have had a stronger case if men wearing Tyvek hazmat suits
and gas masks hadn't walked through the lobby while the camera crews
waited for the tour to start, or if he hadn't acknowledged, moments
later, that the entire building would have to be closed for a complete
renovation."
-- Dana Milbank, 2/23/07
ARCHIVES
Progress Report
STUDENTS
Politics with an Attitude: Everyone from Barack Obama to Stephen Colbert talks to Campus Progress. Right-wingers seem scared of us. Find out why here. |
|
|
|
by Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Amanda Terkel,
Payson Schwin, and Satyam Khanna
IRAQ A Way Out
Americans are looking for a way out of Iraq. Sixty-three
percent of the public want all U.S. troops home from Iraq by the
end of 2008. Another 54
percent said they would vote to cut off funding for the escalation
if they were in Congress. With the support
of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) has
laid out a plan that would both increase support for the overstretched
U.S. military and block Bush's Iraq buildup. Conservatives have
swiftly attacked Murtha's proposal, which will he will likely introduce
next month, claiming that it is a "slow-bleed"
plan that hurts
the troops and aids
the terrorists. But as Americans now recognize, the real injury to
our forces comes from sending them into a brutal civil war with inadequate
equipment and extended
deployments. Next week, the Senate will attempt to "repeal the 2002
resolution authorizing the war in Iraq in favor of narrower authority
that restricts the military's role and begins
withdrawals of combat troops." It also plans to incorporate some of
Murtha's proposals, such as ensuring that all combat troops are proper
equipment. The Washington Post accused Murtha of "cynicism"
and "an alarming ignorance about conditions in Iraq." But it is the
Bush administration that has chosen to ignore the situation on the
ground in order to push a dangerous, unpopular policy. As American
Progress President and CEO John Podesta and Senior Fellow Lawrence Korb
note, Murtha's actions are the "beginning of the real vote that is good
for the country, troops, and Congress." The Center for American
Progress has also put together a plan to strategically redeploy U.S.
troops out of Iraq. Read about it here.
TROOPS MUST BE 'FULLY COMBAT READY': Conservative lawmakers have already blasted Murtha's plan, charging
that it is a "slow-bleed" strategy. "While American troops are
fighting radical Islamic terrorists thousands of miles away, it is
unthinkable that the United
States Congress would move to discredit their mission, cut off
their reinforcements and deny them the resources they need to succeed
and return home safely," said House Minority Leader John Boehner
(R-OH). But U.S. troops are already being denied resources by the Bush
administration; Murtha's plan would ensure that they have them. His
plan would restrict
the $93.4 billion in new combat funds that Bush has requested --
requiring that they be used to increase troop readiness. It would bar a
buildup in Iraq until all troops are "fully combat ready." A
recent audit
by the Pentagon's Inspector General showed that U.S. soldiers have
had to go without
the necessary weapons, armor, vehicles, and equipment in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Additionally, the military lacks equipment and resources
for Bush's escalation plan. The Army and Marine Corps "are short
thousands of vehicles, armor kits and other equipment needed to supply"
the extra 21,500 troops Bush plans to send to Iraq. "It's inevitable
that that has to happen, unless five brigades of up-armored
Humvees fall out of the sky," one senior Army official said.
Chairman of the Joint Cefs of Staff Peter Pace told the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee that "the military has about 41,000 armored
vehicles in Iraq -- fewer
than will be needed 'to cover all of the troops that are
deploying.'" Earlier this week, military officials gave "Congress a long list
of equipment and reconstruction needs totaling nearly $36 billion,
denied earlier by the administration in its $481 billion defense
appropriations request for the new fiscal year." Among those requests
included "more than 5,000 armored vehicles, another $153 million for
systems that defend against the deadly improvised explosive devices in
Iraq and $13 million in language translation systems."
PENTAGON MUST END 'STOP-LOSS' POLICY: Currently, the President
is "extending deployment dates of some Army units from 12
to 16 months and Marine Corps units from seven to 12 months." The
Pentagon's "stop-loss" policies mean that "personnel who could
otherwise leave the military when their volunteer commitments expire
will be forced to remain
to the end of their overseas deployments and up to another 90 days
after they come home." Approximately 170,000 Army
soldiers have now served more than one tour of duty in Iraq. These
policies are stretching an already overstretched military and breaking
the all-volunteer force. George Joulwan, retired four-star Army general
and former NATO commander, said, "They [the troops] are stretched thin.
Whether they're broken or not, I think I would say if we don't change
the way we're doing business, they're
in danger of being fractured and broken, and I would agree with
that." Similarly, the Pentagon plans to send 14,000 National Guard
troops back to Iraq next year. More than 500,000
Guard and Reserve troops have served in Afghanistan and Iraq,
making up nearly half the fighting force in those wars. Guard officials
have also been sending units on foreign deployments every
three to four years, instead of the standard five years. Murtha's
plan would help rebuild the strength and morale of the U.S. military by
requiring all troops to have at least one year at home for training
before redeployment, prohibiting the Pentagon from extending combat
tours,
and ending the Pentagon's "stop-loss" policy. Podesta and Korb note,
"As
anyone knows who has been in the service, like Murtha has, extending
deployment times has a crushing
effect on troop morale and causes havoc with military families."
CUT OFF FUNDING FOR PERMANENT BASES IN
IRAQ: In 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld promised that
any suggestion the United States "is planning a permanent military
presence in Iraq is 'inaccurate
and unfortunate.'" Unfortunately, those suggestions have turned out
to be accurate. The Pentagon has "already
spent $1 billion or more on them, outfitting some with underground
bunkers and other characteristics of long-term bases." It has also
revealed that coalition forces are establishing as least six
"enduring" bases in Iraq, Murtha's plan would ensure that no
funding goes toward establishing a permanent presence in Iraq, a
proposal that has strong backing from the public, lawmakers, and
experts. Seventy-one
percent of the American public opposes establishing permanent bases
in Iraq, and 71
percent of Iraqis want the United States to withdraw all forces
within a year. Last year, both the Senate and the House passed
resolutions that stated the Bush administration could
not use any appropriated funds for the construction of permanent bases in Iraq. One of the Iraq Study Group's key recommendations was that the
"President should state that the United States does not
seek permanent military bases in Iraq." A continued U.S. presence
in Iraq is not contributing to stability. Almost 80
percent of Iraqis believe that the effect of the U.S. military
presence in Iraq is contributing to more chaos, rather than more
stability.
CONGRESS
HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE TROOPS: A small group of
conservatives in the House and the Senate are charging that Congress
has no power to "micromanage"
the war
in Iraq. But as Podesta and Korb note, "As chairman of the Defense
Appropriations Subcommittee, it is Murtha's job to get the Congress to
do everything it can to mitigate
the devastating impact of the president's surge. Despite
conservative claims to the contrary, few in the Congress are in favor
of cutting off funding for the war, since almost no one, including
Murtha, is for a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq. Instead, the vast
majority of those opposing the president are in favor of a phased
redeployment of American forces out of Iraq over the next 12 to 18
months. ... Through legislation, Congress can place the onus on the
president and his appointees as they make policy choices in Iraq,
holding them -- not the troops or the commanders -- responsible for
their choices. Congress can also pass measures to help safeguard the
welfare of our troops, their families, and the country. This is what
Murtha is trying to do by preventing the president from deploying
troops that are not combat ready, preventing extended deployments,
using the back door draft to keep people in the service beyond their
agreed upon times, and overusing the guard and reserve."
|
Under the Radar
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS -- RICE
PRESSURES ISRAEL TO REJECT 'EXPLORATORY CONTACTS' WITH SYRIA: Today, Josh Marshall from Talking Points Memo points to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that reports, "The United States demanded that Israel desist from even
exploratory
contacts with Syria, of the sort that would test whether Damascus is
serious in its declared intentions to hold peace talks with Israel."
"In meetings with Israeli officials recently," the paper reports,
"Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was forceful in expressing
Washington's view on the matter." "The American argument is that even
'exploratory talks' would be
considered a prize in Damascus, whose policy and actions continue
to
undermine Lebanon's sovereignty and the functioning of its government,
while it also continues to stir unrest in Iraq, to the detriment of the
U.S. presence there." "When Israeli officials asked Secretary Rice
about the possibility of
exploring the seriousness of Syria in its calls for peace talks, her
response was unequivocal: Don't even
think about it."
As Rice pressures other governments to reject direct talks with Syria,
the Bush administration continues to oppose future U.S.-Syria talks because, as Rice puts it, "We've
generally gotten nowhere" with previous attempts at diplomacy. But
former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who supports direct talks with both Syria and Iran, recently rejected
the White House’s excuse. “I don’t like
the administration saying, ‘Powell went, Armitage went ?
and [they] got
nothing.â We got plenty,â he said. âYou canât
negotiate when you tell
the other side, âGive us what a negotiation would produce before
the
negotiations start.'" The Iraq Study Group has called for direct talks
because "Syria
can make a major contribution to Iraqâs stability in several ways."
ECONOMY --Â RECORD NUMBER OF
AMERICANS LIVING IN SEVERE POVERTY: America's poor have yet
to reap the benefits of the recent economic expansion as the gap between the "haves" and
"have-nots" "continues to wide." In an analysis of 2005 census figures,
McClatchy newspapers found that "nearly 16 million Americans are living
near deep or severe poverty," a 32-year high. The analysis revealed
that from 2000 to 2005, the number of severely poor swelled by 26
percent -- the highest growth rate for any other segment of
the population.
Steven Woolf, co-author of the study, said the results were the
opposite of what his team expected. "We're not seeing as
much moderate poverty as a proportion of the population," he explained.
"What we're
seeing is a dramatic
growth of severe poverty." The results show a stark
rise in income inequality in the United States, as "the share of
national income
going to corporate profits has has dwarfed the amount going to wages
and salaries."Â Washington, D.C. has the highest rate of people
living in extreme poverty -- 10.8
percent. The long-term effects of more
children growing up in this poverty will be widespread, explains
the Center for American Progress, including increased crime rates and
health care costs. With such high levels of poverty, the need to invest
in resources to reduce poverty such as early childhood education,
urban revitalization, and raising the minimum wage, is more
crucial than ever.
IRAQ --Â CHALABI MAKES POLITICAL
COMEBACK IN IRAQ, OVERSEES ESCALATION STRATEGY: The Wall Street
Journal reports,
"In his latest remarkable political reincarnation, onetime U.S.
favorite
Ahmed Chalabi has secured a position inside the Iraqi government that
could help determine whether the Bush administration's new push to
secure Baghdad succeeds." The vaguely defined position will allow
Chalabi to serve "as an intermediary between Baghdad residents and the
Iraqi and U.S. security forces mounting an aggressive counterinsurgency
campaign across the city." Created by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki,
the position "is meant to help Iraqis arrange reimbursement for damage
to their cars and homes caused by the security sweeps in the hope of
maintaining public support for the strategy." Chalabi has had a sordid
history with the U.S. involvement in Iraq. He was paid by
administration intelligence agencies to provide evidence for the Iraq
war, nearly all of which turned out to be false. Among Chalabi's
questionable activities, he provided
dubious Iraqi sources to the administration in the run-up to the
war, he helped plant
fabricated news stories about Iraq's weapons, and he was accused of passing
U.S. secrets to Iran. In the Dec. 2005 Iraqi elections,
Chalabi's political party failed to win a single parliamentary seat. He
has remained, however, "an active behind-the-scenes player in Iraq's
chaotic political scene." A senior American official said, "The
question is whether he is really doing this to help, or whether
he's trying to build himself a new political base in Baghdad or carry
water for the Shiites. And we
simply don't know the answer to that yet."
|
|
Think Fast
âIraq may be facing a deadly civil war, but the Iraqi
government is
initiating major, costly repairs to its diplomatic building in
Washington and expanding its real estate holdings here.â The Iraqi
government recently purchased a $5.8 million mansion complete
with âheated floorsâ?and spacious bathrooms, one
with a Jacuzzi.â
U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair yesterday âdeclared
himself at odds with hawks in the US Administrationâ over
Iran. He told BBC News, âI canât think that it would be
right to take military action against Iran. â?
What is important is to pursue the political, diplomatic channel.â
The White House yesterday announced âplans to replace
the assistant defense secretary for health affairsâ
â William Winkenwerder â âtwo days after a review was
ordered into
outpatient care for wounded troops.â The Pentagon claimed the
announcement had âno
bearing on current events whatsoever.â
Day two of jury deliberations in the Scooter Libby trial produced no verdict. Yesterday, the jury of eight women and four men
ârequested a large flip chart, masking tape, Post-it notes and a document
with pictures of the witnesses.âÂ
World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz may appoint a new resident director for Iraq. âThis is exactly
what he
shouldnât be doing and what the [Bank] board was initially afraid
that
he would do, which is to use the financial resources of the World Bank
to take some of
the heat off the U.S. Treasury and U.S. policy,â said Bea
Edwards of the Government Accountability Project.
âBallot initiatives for increasing the minimum wage boosted
voter motivation in five targeted states in 2006,â a new study shows. Voter motivation and reported
interest in
the election was âdisproportionately highâ among
African-Americans,
unmarried voters and women.
Parents have complained after ninth graders at a North Carolina
school were given anti-Muslim literature in class.
The handouts described Mohammed as a âcriminalâ and
âdemon possessed,â
and included pamphlets with titles such as âJesus not
Muhammadâ and âDo Not Marry
a Muslim Man.â
And finally: âThe tables will turn on Justice Stephen
Breyer next month, when instead of posing obscure questions at Supreme Court
arguments, heâll be answering them - with no clerks to help on
research.â In an apparent first, Breyer
will appear on a quiz show, as the celebrity guest on the March 17
installment of NPRâs âWait, Wait, Donât
Tell Me!â
|
|